Challenges in Planning Long-term Care Menus: That Meet Dietary Recommendations

Publication: Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research
17 May 2013

Abstract

Purpose: Long-term care (LTC) homes plan menus based on Eating Well with Canada’s Food Guide (CFG) recommendations for older adults. To determine whether recommended CFG servings and nutrients were being provided, we analyzed the menu of a large LTC facility in a metropolitan area and compared our analysis with a similar one conducted in 2000.
Methods: A full week’s menu from a large Saskatoon LTC facility was analyzed and compared with CFG and recent Dietary Recommended Intake nutrient recommendations. The menu was analyzed using The Food Processor SQL. The 2011 menu was compared with the similar 2000 menu analysis to permit an evaluation of changes over a decade.
Results: The 2011 menu demonstrated a significant improvement in servings of vegetables and fruit (4.6 to 7.2 servings). Servings of grain products had declined from 4.9 to 3.6 and servings of milk and alternatives had declined from 2.4 to 1.2 since 2000. Servings of meat and alternatives, total carbohydrate, and protein were not significantly different. Foods on the 2011 menu were lower in fat and higher in dietary fibre and offered more vitamins and minerals.
Conclusions: Greater attention to the planning of LTC menus may explain improvements in the 2011 LTC menu. The current menu, however, needs to overcome the challenges that prevent it from meeting CFG recommendations for older adults.

Résumé

Objectif: Les établissements de soins de longue durée (ÉSLD) planifient leurs menus en fonction des recommandations du Guide alimentaire canadien (GAC) à l’intention des aînés. Afin de déterminer si les portions et les nutriments recommandés dans le GAC étaient fournis, nous avons analysé le menu d’un important ÉSLD situé dans une zone urbaine et avons comparé nos résultats à ceux d’une analyse similaire publiée en 2000.
Méthodes: Le menu d’une semaine complète d’un important ÉSLD de Saskatoon a été analysé et comparé aux recommandations du GAC et aux récentes directives sur l’apport alimentaire recommandé en nutriments. Le menu a été analysé à l’aide du Food Processor SQL. Le menu de 2011 a été comparé à un menu semblable de 2000 pour permettre une évaluation des changements au fil d’une décennie.
Résultats: Le menu de 2011 démontrait une amélioration significative quant aux portions de légumes et fruits (4,6 à 7,2 portions). Les portions de produits céréaliers avaient diminué de 4,9 à 3,6, et les portions de lait et substituts avaient baissé de 2,4 à 1,2 depuis 2000. Les portions de viandes et substituts, de glucides totaux et de protéines n’affichaient pas de différence significative. Les aliments du menu de 2011 étaient plus pauvres en matières grasses et plus riches en fibres alimentaires, en plus de contenir davantage de vitamines et minéraux.
Conclusions: La plus grande attention accordée à la planification des menus des ÉSLD pourrait expliquer les améliorations du menu de 2011 de l’ÉSLD. Certaines améliorations doivent toutefois être apportées au menu actuel afin qu’il suive les recommandations du GAC pour les aînés.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

cover image Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research
Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research
Volume 74Number 2July 2013
Pages: 84 - 87

History

Version of record online: 17 May 2013

Authors

Affiliations

Navita Viveky, MSc
College of Pharmacy & Nutrition, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK
Jennifer Billinsky, PhD
College of Pharmacy & Nutrition, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK
Lilian Thorpe, MD, PhD
College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK
Jane Alcorn, PhD
College of Pharmacy & Nutrition, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK
Thomas Hadjistavropoulos, PhD
Department of Psychology, University of Regina, Regina, SK
Susan J. Whiting, PhD
College of Pharmacy & Nutrition, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Other Metrics

Citations

Cite As

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

1. Provincial Differences in Long-Term Care Menu Variety and Food Intake for Residents who Consume a Regular Texture
2. Is Fibre an Effective Strategy to Improve Laxation in Long-Term Care Residents?
3. Micronutrients on the Menu: Enhancing the Quality of Food in Long-term Care for Regular, Nontherapeutic Menus

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Subscribe

Click on the button below to subscribe to Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research

Purchase options

Purchase this article to get full access to it.

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

View options

PDF

View PDF

Media

Media

Other

Tables

Share Options

Share

Share the article link

Share on social media