Older Adults’ Perceptions of the 2019 Canada’s Food Guide: A Qualitative Study

Publication: Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research
5 April 2024

Abstract

Purpose: Major changes were made to Canada’s Food Guide (CFG) in 2019. This study aimed to understand the perceptions of older adults toward this newest version.
Methods: Older adults were invited to participate via newsletters sent to older adults and retirees’ organizations in the Province of Quebec. Participants completed an online survey about their baseline familiarity with the 2019 CFG using a 5-point Likert scale and took part in an individual semi-structured online interview, which explored their perceptions toward the 2019 CFG. A thematic qualitative analysis of the interview transcripts was performed.
Results: Fifty-eight older adults (>65 years, 30 women, 28 men, including 19 consumers and 39 non-consumers of plant-based protein (PBP) foods) participated in the study. Older adults were mostly familiar with the 2019 CFG and had a positive perception of its features. They appreciated the design, proposed recipes, and healthy eating recommendations. Perceptions about the three food groups were mixed, mainly regarding the decreased emphasis on dairy products. Some appreciated that animal proteins were less prominent, while others raised issues on how to integrate PBP into their diet. Perceptions appeared to be influenced by sex and PBP consumption.
Conclusion: Older adults in the Province of Quebec view most of the 2019 CFG recommendations positively. Our observations may be useful to dietitians and public health practitioners when developing strategies to improve adherence.

Résumé

Objectif. Des changements majeurs ont été apportés au Guide alimentaire canadien (GAC) en 2019. Cette étude visait à comprendre les perceptions des ainés à l’égard de cette nouvelle version.
Méthodes. Les personnes âgées ont été invitées à participer via des bulletins d’information envoyés aux organismes de personnes âgées et de retraités de la province de Québec. Les participants ont répondu à un sondage en ligne sur leur niveau de référence connaissance du CFG 2019 sur une échelle de Likert en 5 points et participation à un entretien individuel en ligne semi-structuré, qui a exploré leurs perceptions vers le CFG 2019. Les transcriptions des entrevues ont fait l’objet d’une analyse qualitative thématique.
Résultats. Cinquante-huit personnes âgées (>65 ans, 30 femmes, 28 hommes, dont 19 consommateurs et 39 non-consommateurs de protéines végétales (PV) aliments) ont participé à l’étude. Les aînés connaissaient pour la plupart le GAG 2019 et avaient une perception positive de ses caractéristiques. Ils appréciaient le graphisme, les recettes proposées et les recommandations en matière de saine alimentation. Les perceptions quant aux trois catégories d’aliments étaient mixtes, principalement en ce qui concerne la diminution de l’importance accordée aux produits laitiers. Certains ont apprécié que les protéines animales soient moins mises en évidence, tandis que d’autres ont soulevé des questions sur la manière d’intégrer les PV à leur alimentation. Les perceptions semblaient influencées par le sexe et la consommation de PV.
Conclusions. Les aînés du Québec ont une perception positive de la plupart des recommandations du GAC 2019. Nos observations pourraient être utiles pour les diététistes et les professionnels de la santé publique lors de l’élaboration de stratégies visant à améliorer l’adhésion.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Funding Source: This research was supported by the Centre Nutrition, santé et société (NUTRISS), Institut sur la nutrition et les aliments fonctionnels (INAF), and Centre d’excellence sur le vieillissement de Québec (CEVQ).
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

1
Government of Canada. History of Canada’s Food Guides from 1942 to 2007 [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2022 Aug 30]. Available from: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/canada-food-guide/about/history-food-guide.html
2
Health Canada. Canada’s food guide [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2022 Sep 30]. Available from: https://food-guide.canada.ca/en/
3
Government of Canada. Healthy eating for seniors [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2022 Sep 30]. Available from: https://food-guide.canada.ca/en/tips-for-healthy-eating/seniors/
4
Brassard D, Elvidge Munene LA, St Pierre S, Gonzalez A, Guenther PM, Jessri M, et al. Evaluation of the Healthy Eating Food Index (HEFI)-2019 measuring adherence to Canada’s Food Guide 2019 recommendations on healthy food choices. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2022 May;47(5):582–594.
5
Fernandez MA, Bertolo RF, Duncan AM, Phillips SM, Elango R, Ma DWL, et al. Translating “protein foods” from the new Canada’s Food Guide to consumers: knowledge gaps and recommendations. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2020 Dec;45(12):1311–1323.
6
Patel P, Mannion C. Maternal impressions of the new 2019 Canadian Food Guide snapshot. Can J Diet Pract Res. 2021 Dec 1;82(4):192–5.
7
Barco Leme AC, Laila A, Hou S, Fisberg RM, Ma DWL, Fisberg M, et al. Perceptions of the 2019 Canada’s Food Guide: a qualitative study with parents from Southwestern Ontario. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2021 Aug 19;1–7.
8
Ramuscak AV, Ma DWL, Forbes LE, Duncan AM, Sadowski A, and Haines J. Comparing the perceptions and opinions of the 2007 and 2019 Canada’s food guides among parents of young children. Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 9;10:944648.
9
Corkum A, Vanderlee L, White CM, Hammond D. Awareness of Canada’s Food Guide Among Canadian Youth. Can J Diet Pract Res. 2022 Aug 25;1–5.
10
Zhang F, Laila A, Leme ACB, Ma DWL, and Haines J. Knowledge and perceptions of the 2019 Canada’s Food Guide: A qualitative study with Canadian children. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2022 Nov;47(11):1096–1103.
11
Statistics Canada. Annual Demographic Estimates: Canada, Provinces and Territories, 2021 [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2022 Jul 30]. Available from: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/91-215-x/91-215-x2021001-fra.htm
12
Drolet-Labelle V, Laurin D, Bédard A, Drapeau V, Desroches S. Beliefs underlying older adults’ intention to consume plant-based protein foods: A qualitative study. Appetite. 2023 Jan;180:106346.
13
Mathe N, Van der Meer L, Agborsangaya CB, Murray T, Storey K, Johnson JA, et al. Prompted awareness and use of “Eating Well with Canada’s Food Guide”: a population-based study. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2015 Feb;28(1):64–71.
14
Vanderlee L, McCrory C, and Hammond D. Awareness and knowledge of recommendations from Canada’s Food Guide. Can J Diet Pract Res. 2015 Sep;76(3):146–149.
15
Talati Z, Pettigrew S, Moore S, and Pratt IS. Adults and children prefer a plate food guide relative to a pyramid. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2017 Jan;26(1):169–74.
16
Hunt P, Rayner M, and Gatenby S. Pyramid or Plate?: The development of a National Food Guide for the UK: a preliminary article. Nutr Food Sci. 1994 Aug 1;94(4):7–12.
17
St-Pierre M. Changes in Canadians’ preferences for milk and dairy products. Catalogue Statistics Canada. 2017;(21):9.
18
Clarys P, Deliens T, Huybrechts I, Deriemaeker P, Vanaelst B, De Keyzer W, et al. Comparison of nutritional quality of the vegan, vegetarian, semi-Vegetarian, pesco-vegetarian and omnivorous diet. Nutrients. 2014 Mar 24;6(3):1318–1332.
19
Jeruszka-Bielak M, Kollajtis-Dolowy A, Santoro A, Ostan R, Berendsen AAM, Jennings A, et al. Are nutrition-related knowledge and attitudes reflected in lifestyle and health among elderly people? A study across five European countries. Front Physiol. 2018 Jul 31;9:994.
20
Doub AE, Small ML, Levin A, LeVangie K, and Brick TR. Identifying users of traditional and Internet-based resources for meal ideas: An association rule learning approach. Appetite. 2016 Aug;103:128–136.
21
Canadian Foundation for Dietetic Research. Tracking nutrition trends [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2023 Mar 2]. Available from: https://cfdr.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Tracking-Nutrition-Trends-IX-2015.pdf

Supplementary Material

File (cjdpr-2023-029suppla.docx)

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

cover image Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research
Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research
Volume 85Number 2June 2024
Pages: 111 - 114
Editor: Naomi Cahill

History

Version of record online: 5 April 2024

Key Words

  1. Older adults
  2. Canada’s Food Guide
  3. qualitative research
  4. perceptions

Mots-clés

  1. aînés
  2. Guide alimentaire canadien
  3. recherche qualitative
  4. perceptions

Authors

Affiliations

Virginie Drolet-Labelle DtP, MSc
Institut sur la nutrition et les aliments fonctionnels (INAF), Université Laval, Québec, QC
Centre Nutrition, santé et société (NUTRISS), Université Laval, Québec, QC
Centre d’excellence sur le vieillissement de Québec, Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec – Université Laval and VITAM-Centre de recherche en santé durable, CIUSSS-CN, Québec, QC
École de nutrition, Université Laval, Québec, QC
Institut sur le vieillissement et la participation sociale des aînés - Université Laval, Québec, QC
Alexandra Bédard DtP, PhD
Vicky Drapeau DtP, PhD
Sophie Desroches DtP, PhD
Faculté de pharmacie, Université Laval, Québec, QC
Département d’éducation physique, Université Laval, Québec, QC

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Other Metrics

Citations

Cite As

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

There are no citations for this item

View Options

Login options

Check if you access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Subscribe

Click on the button below to subscribe to Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research

Purchase options

Purchase this article to get full access to it.

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

View options

PDF

View PDF

Full Text

View Full Text

Media

Media

Other

Tables

Share Options

Share

Share the article link

Share on social media