Acceptability of an Online Module Addressing Weight Bias: Perspectives and Attitudes of Undergraduate Health Students and Instructors

Publication: Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research
22 November 2022

Abstract

Weight bias and discrimination are highly pervasive and harmful to Canadians with higher weights. Researchers and practitioners who deliver, evaluate, and advise on dietary and weight-related interventions may inadvertently perpetuate weight bias through their work; however, trainees in these fields rarely have access to weight bias education within their applied health programs. This study evaluated the acceptability of an online educational weight bias module developed for undergraduate students enrolled in health courses. The intervention included a pre-recorded 20-minute online module with prompts for reflection or discussion, a self-assessment quiz, as well as a separate module and range of resources for instructors. Overall, 211 students from applied health courses and 4 instructors completed an online survey querying the module’s delivery, impact, and relevance. Students agreed that the module provided useful information (82%), was easy to understand (97%), and was the right length (75%), but reported wanting more interactivity and engagement with the content. Instructors found the module engaging and useful and expressed interest in additional resources and support for weight bias education. Future research should explore the impact of weight bias education on students’ weight-related attitudes and perceptions as well as feasibility and relevance of online features such as multimedia tools.

Résumé

La discrimination et les préjugés par rapport au poids sont très répandus et néfastes pour les Canadiennes et Canadiens ayant un poids plus élevé. Les chercheurs et praticiens qui effectuent, évaluent et recommandent des interventions liées à l’alimentation et au poids pourraient, par inadvertance, perpétuer des préjugés par rapport au poids dans le cadre de leur travail. Toutefois, les apprenants dans ces domaines ont rarement accès à une formation sur les préjugés à l’égard du poids pendant leur programme de santé appliquée. Cette étude évaluait l’acceptabilité d’un module de formation en ligne sur les préjugés par rapport au poids conçu pour les étudiants de premier cycle inscrits à des cours dans le domaine de la santé. L’intervention comprenait un module en ligne préenregistré de 20 minutes avec des appels à réfléchir ou discuter, un questionnaire d’autoévaluation, ainsi qu’un module distinct et un éventail de ressources pour les formateurs. En tout, 211 étudiants suivant des cours sur la santé appliquée et 4 formateurs ont répondu à un sondage en ligne portant sur le déroulement, l’impact et la pertinence du module. Les étudiants ont indiqué que le module a fourni des renseignements pertinents (82 %), qu’il était facile à comprendre (97 %) et qu’il était d’une durée appropriée (75 %), mais ont dit souhaiter pouvoir interagir davantage avec le contenu. Les formateurs ont trouvé le module intéressant et utile. Ils ont fait part de leur intérêt pour des ressources supplémentaires et du soutien en matière de formation sur les préjugés par rapport au poids. Les recherches futures devraient explorer l’impact de la formation sur les préjugés à l’égard du poids sur les attitudes et perceptions des étudiants en la matière, ainsi que la faisabilité et la pertinence d’outils en ligne comme les outils multimédias.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

REFERENCES

1
Alberga AS, Russell-Mayhew S, von Ranson KM, and McLaren L. Weight bias: A call to action. J Eat Disord. 2016;4(1):34.
2
Puhl RM and Heuer CA. The stigma of obesity: A review and update. Obesity. 2009;17(5):941–964.
3
Meadows A, Daníelsdóttir S. What’s in a word? On weight stigma and terminology. Vol. 7, Frontiers in Psychology. Frontiers Media SA; 2016. p. 1527.
4
Brownell KD, Puhl RM, Schwartz MB, Rudd L. Weight bias: Nature, consequences, and remedies. New York: Guilford Press; 2005.
5
Vadiveloo M and Mattei J. Perceived weight discrimination and 10-year risk of allostatic load among US adults. Ann Behav Med. 2017;51(1):94–104.
6
Pearl RL and Puhl RM. Weight bias internalization and health: A systematic review. Obes Rev. 2018;19(8):1141–1163.
7
Panza GA, Armstrong LE, Taylor BA, Puhl RM, Livingston J, and Pescatello LS. Weight bias among exercise and nutrition professionals: A systematic review. Obes Rev. 2018;19(11):1492–1503.
8
Sonneville KR, Rose KL, Lambrecht NJ, Barry MR, Weeks HM, and Leung CW. Weight bias among public health trainees. Public Health Nutr. 2021;24(6):1566–1569.
9
Bessey M, Brady J, Lordly D, and Leighteizer V. “This is what you’re supposed to do”: Weight stigma in dietetics education. Fat Stud. 2021;10(2):184–196.
10
Dwyer JJM, Starr A, Mills C, and Haines J. Undergraduate Female, nutrition students’ perceptions of curricular influence on attitudes toward individuals with obesity. Can J Diet Pract Res. 2016;77(4):177–182.
11
Howes EM, Harden SM, Cox HK, and Hedrick VE. Communicating about weight in dietetics practice: Recommendations for reduction of weight bias and stigma. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2021;121(9):1669.
12
Kebritchi M, Lipschuetz A, and Santiague L. Issues and challenges for teaching successful online courses in higher education. J Educ Technol Syst. 2017;46(1):4–29.
13
Alberga AS, Pickering BJ, Alix Hayden K, Ball GDC, Edwards A, Jelinski S, et al. Weight bias reduction in health professionals: A systematic review. Clin Obes. 2016;6(3):175–188.
14
Dhawan S. Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. J Educ Technol Syst. 2020;49(1):5–22.
15
Watts L. Synchronous and asynchronous communication in distance learning: A review of the literature. Q Rev Distance Educ. 2016; 17(1):23–32.
16
O’Brien KS, Puhl RM, Latner JD, Mir AS, and Hunter JA. Reducing anti-fat prejudice in preservice health students: A randomized trial. Obesity. 2010;18(11):2138–2144.
17
Rubino F, Puhl RM, Cummings DE, Eckel RH, Ryan DH, Mechanick JI, et al. Joint international consensus statement for ending stigma of obesity. Nat Med. 2020;26(4):485–497.
18
Ramos Salas X, Forhan M, Caulfield T, Sharma AM, and Raine K. A critical analysis of obesity prevention policies and strategies. Can J Public Heal. 2017;108(5–6):e598–e608.
19
Bacon L and Aphramor L. Weight science: Evaluating the evidence for a paradigm shift. Nutr J. 2011;10(1):9.
20
Frederick DA, Saguy AC, Sandhu G, and Mann T. Effects of competing news media frames of weight on antifat stigma, beliefs about weight and support for obesity-related public policies. Int J Obes. 2016 Mar 23;40(3):543–549.
21
DeBarr K and Pettit M. Weight matters: Health educators’ knowledge of obesity and attitudes toward people who are obese. Am J Heal Educ. 2016;47(6):365–372.
22
Cameron E. Challenging “size matters” messages: An exploration of the experiences of critical obesity scholars in higher education. Can J High Educ. 2016;46(2):111–126.
23
Alvaro C, Jackson LA, Kirk S, McHugh TL, Hughes J, Chircop A, et al. Moving Canadian governmental policies beyond a focus on individual lifestyle: Some insights from complexity and critical theories. Health Promot Int. 2011;26(1):91–99.
24
Braun V and Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
25
Puhl RM, Schwartz MB, and Brownell KD. Impact of perceived consensus on stereotypes about obese people: A new approach for reducing bias. Heal Psychol. 2005;24(5):517–525.
26
Swift JA, Tischler V, Markham S, Gunning I, Glazebrook C, Beer C, et al. Are anti-stigma films a useful strategy for reducing weight bias among trainee healthcare professionals? Results of a pilot randomized control trial. Obes Facts. 2013;6(1):91–102.
27
Kushner RF, Zeiss DM, Feinglass JM, and Yelen M. An obesity educational intervention for medical students addressing weight bias and communication skills using standardized patients. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14(1):53.
28
MacKean G, GermAnn K. Reducing Weight Bias and Stigma in British Columbia’s Health Care System Findings from a Critical Review of the Literature and Environmental Scan. 2013.
29
Wijayatunga NN, Kim Y, Butsch WS, and Dhurandhar EJ. The effects of a teaching intervention on weight bias among kinesiology undergraduate students. Int J Obes. 2019;43:2273–2281.
30
Hague AL and White AA. Web-based intervention for changing attitudes of obesity among current and future teachers. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2005;37(2):58–66.
31
Rukavina PB, Li W, and Rowell MB. A service learning based intervention to change attitudes toward obese individuals in kinesiology pre-professionals. Soc Psychol Educ. 2008;11(1):95–112.
32
Ciao AC and Latner JD. Reducing obesity stigma: The effectiveness of cognitive dissonance and social consensus interventions. Obesity. 2011;19(9):1768–1774.
33
Bombak AE. The “obesity epidemic”: Evolving science, unchanging etiology. Sociol Compass. 2014;8(5):509–524.
34
Guthman J. Teaching the politics of obesity: Insights into neoliberal embodiment and contemporary biopolitics. Antipode. 2009;41(5):1110–1133.
35
Doucet E, Hall K, Miller A, Taylor VH, Ricupero M, Haines J, et al. Emerging insights in weight management and prevention: Implications for practice and research. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2021;46(3):288–293.
36
Gloor JL and Puhl RM. Empathy and perspective-taking: Examination and comparison of strategies to reduce weight stigma. Stigma Heal. 2016;1(4):269–279.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

cover image Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research
Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research
Volume 84Number 1March 2023
Pages: 43 - 48
Editor: Naomi Cahill

History

Version of record online: 22 November 2022

Key Words

  1. weight bias
  2. online education
  3. nutrition education
  4. public health

Mots-clés

  1. préjugés par rapport au poids
  2. formation en ligne
  3. éducation à la nutrition
  4. santé publique

Authors

Affiliations

Amanda Raffoul PhD
Division of Adolescent/Young Adult Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA
Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
Lesley Andrade MHSc, RD
School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON
Rachel B. Acton PhD
School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON
Kirsten M. Lee PhD
School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON
School of Global Health, York University, Toronto, ON
Kathleen E. Burns PhD
School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON
Katelyn M. Godin PhD
School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON
Rhona M. Hanning PhD, RD, FDC
School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Other Metrics

Citations

Cite As

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

There are no citations for this item

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Subscribe

Click on the button below to subscribe to Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research

Purchase options

Purchase this article to get full access to it.

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

View options

PDF

View PDF

Full Text

View Full Text

Media

Media

Other

Tables

Share Options

Share

Share the article link

Share on social media