Assessment of Knowledge of Gluten-Free Diet Amongst Food Handlers in Hospitals

Publication: Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research
22 November 2022

Abstract

Purpose: When admitted to the hospital, individuals with celiac disease rely on food handlers for provision of safe, uncontaminated gluten-free meals. We aimed to assess the knowledge of gluten-free diet (GFD) amongst individuals involved in meal preparation for patients.
Methods: A questionnaire with 10 demographic and 35 test items to assess knowledge of GFD, including workplace scenarios encountered in meal preparation, was administered to food handlers including cooks, utility workers, dietary technicians, and supervisors in 2 tertiary care, university-affiliated hospitals. A score of ≥28 of 35 (≥80%) was considered a “pass”.
Results: A total of 72 individuals completed the study, mean age 40.3 ± 1.6 years, 75% female. Only 42 (56.8%) scored ≥80% and achieved a pass. The average score was 75.9% ± 13.4%, range 25.7%–100%. The supervisors had significantly higher scores (87.9% ± 11.4%) than utility workers (73.0% ± 11.4%; P = 0.01) and cooks (71.7% ± 14.5%; P = 0.01). Cooks had the lowest scores with 80% scoring <80%. Females scored higher than males (77.8% vs. 68.8%; P = 0.02).
Conclusions: There are significant differences in GFD knowledge amongst various groups involved in food preparation in hospitals. The gaps identified in knowledge can potentially compromise the safety of patients with celiac disease. Targeted interventions to educate hospital food handlers about GFD are warranted. Registered Dietitians can play an important role in providing this education.

Résumé

Objectif. Lorsqu’elles sont admises à l’hôpital, les personnes atteintes de la maladie cœliaque comptent sur les manipulateurs d’aliments pour leur procurer des repas sans gluten sécuritaires et non contaminés. Nous voulions évaluer les connaissances sur le régime sans gluten (RSG) des personnes jouant un rôle dans la préparation des repas des patients.
Méthodes. Un questionnaire comprenant 10 questions démographiques et 35 questions d’évaluation des connaissances sur le RSG, dont des scénarios de préparation de repas en milieu de travail, a été distribué à des manipulateurs d’aliments. Parmi ceux-ci se trouvaient des cuisiniers, des employés de services publics, des techniciens en diététique et des superviseurs dans 2 hôpitaux de soins tertiaires affiliés à une université. Un score de ≥ 28 sur 35 (≥ 80 %) était considéré comme un succès.
Résultats. Au total, 72 personnes ont participé à l’étude. L’âge moyen était de 40,3 ± 1,6 ans, et 75 % étaient des femmes. Seulement 42 personnes (56,8 %) ont réussi avec un score de ≥ 80 %. Le score moyen était de 75,9 ± 13,4 %, avec une fourchette de 25,7 % à 100 %. Les superviseurs ont obtenu des scores significativement plus élevés (87,9 ± 11,4 %) que les employés de services publics (73,0 % ± 11,4 %; P = 0,01) et les cuisiniers (71,7 % ± 14,5 %; P = 0,01). Les cuisiniers ont obtenu les plus faibles scores; 80 % d’entre eux ayant obtenu un score < 80 %. Les femmes ont obtenu un score plus élevé que les hommes (77,8 % contre 68,8 %; P = 0,02).
Conclusions. On observe des différences significatives quant aux connaissances sur le RSG parmi les divers groupes jouant un rôle dans la préparation des aliments dans les hôpitaux. Les écarts relevés dans les connaissances pourraient compromettre la sécurité des patients atteints de la maladie cœliaque. Des interventions ciblées visant à former les manipulateurs d’aliments dans les hôpitaux sur le RSG sont nécessaires. Les diététistes peuvent jouer un rôle important dans cette formation.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Financial support: No funding was secured for this study.
Conflicts of interest: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

REFERENCES

1
CodexAlimentarius: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2008. [cited 2022 Jul 8] Available from https://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/en/
2
Zarkadas M, Dubois S, MacIsaac K, Cantin I, Rashid M, Roberts K, et al. Living with coeliac disease and a gluten-free diet: A Canadian perspective. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2013 Feb;26(1):10–23.
3
MacCulloch K and Rashid M. Factors affecting adherence to gluten-free diet in children with celiac disease. Paediatr Child Health. 2014 Jun;19(6):305–309.
4
Rubio-Tapia A, Hill ID, Kelly CP, Calderwood AH, and Murray JA. American College of Gastroenterology clinical guidelines: Diagnosis and management of celiac disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 May;108(5):656–676.
5
Jamnik J, Villa CR, Dhir SB, Jenkins DJ, and El-Sohemy A. Prevalence of positive coeliac disease serology and HLA risk genotypes in a multiethnic population of adults in Canada: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2017 Oct;7(1):e017678.
6
Karajeh MA, Hurlstone DP, Patel TM, and Sanders DS. Chefs’ knowledge of coeliac disease (compared to the public): a questionnaire survey from the United Kingdom. Clin Nutr. 2005 Apr;24(2):206–210.
7
Aziz I, Karajeh MA, Zilkha J, Tubman E, Fowles C, and Sanders D. Change in awareness of gluten-related disorders among chefs and the general public in the UK: a 10-year follow-up study. Eur J GastroenterolHepatol. 2014 Nov;26(11):1228–1233.
8
Simpson S, Lebwohl B, Lewis SK, Tennyson CA, Sanders D, and Green PH. Awareness of gluten-related disorders: A survey of the general public, chefs and patients. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2011 Oct;6(5):E227–31.
9
Young I and Thaivalappil A. A systematic review and meta-regression of the knowledge, practices, and training of restaurant and food service personnel toward food allergies and celiac disease. PLoS One. 2018 Sep;13(9):e0203496.
10
Goodyer L, Brown LJ, and Crowley E. Celiac disease knowledge and practice of dietitians in rural New South Wales, Australia. Food Nutr Sci. 2016 Aug;7(10):874–83.
11
Assiri AM, Saeed A, Saeed E, El-Mouzan MI, Alsarkhy AA, Al-Turaiki M, et al. Assessment of knowledge of celiac disease among health care professionals. Saudi Med J. 2015 Jun;36(6):751–753.
12
Kincaid JP, Fishburne RP, Rogers RL, Chissom BS. Derivation of New Readability Formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count and Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for Navy Enlisted Personnel. Millington (TN): Naval Education and Training Support Command; 1975 Feb. Report no.: RBR 8-75. Contract no.: N61339-74-D-0082. Sponsored by the Chief of Naval Technical Training.
13
Lance CE, Butts MM, and Michels LC. The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria: What did they really say? Organ Res Methods. 2006 Apr;9(2):202–220.
14
Schultz M, Shin S, and Coppell KJ. Awareness of coeliac disease among chefs and cooks depends on the level and place of training. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2017 Apr;26(4):719–24.
15
Falcomer AL, Arauo LS, Farage P, Monteiro JS, Nakano EY, and Zandonadi RP. Gluten contamination in food services and industry: A systematic review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2020 Dec;60(3):479–93.

Supplementary Material

File (cjdpr-2022-029suppla.docx)

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

cover image Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research
Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research
Volume 84Number 2June 2023
Pages: 63 - 68
Editor: Naomi Cahill

History

Version of record online: 22 November 2022

Key Words

  1. celiac disease
  2. gluten-free diet
  3. food safety
  4. chefs

Mots-clés

  1. maladie cœliaque
  2. régime sans gluten
  3. salubrité des aliments
  4. chefs

Authors

Affiliations

Felix Zhou MD
Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS.
Tyler Mullen MD, FRCPC
Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS.
Tasha Kulai MD, FRCPC
Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS.
Mohsin Rashid MD, MEd, FRCPC
Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Other Metrics

Citations

Cite As

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

There are no citations for this item

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Subscribe

Click on the button below to subscribe to Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research

Purchase options

Purchase this article to get full access to it.

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

View options

PDF

View PDF

Full Text

View Full Text

Media

Media

Other

Tables

Share Options

Share

Share the article link

Share on social media