Assessment of Registered Dietitians’ Beliefs and Practices for a Nutrition Counselling Approach

Publication: Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research
16 May 2016

Abstract

Purpose: This study describes registered dietitians’ (RDs) perceptions and use of a nutrition counselling approach (NCA) as defined by the American Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Nutrition Care Process terminology (NCPT).
Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was administered to approximately 500 RDs in Alberta, Canada. Items included demographics, job characteristics, perceived knowledge, competence, use of an NCA, training experience, and theory of planned behaviour salient beliefs. Descriptive analyses compared RDs who counselled “all or most” of their clients with those who counselled “some or none.” Salient beliefs were analyzed using content analysis.
Results: Of the 349 RDs who completed the survey, 64.2% provided an NCA to “all or most” of their patients. RDs were supportive of using an NCA (mean = 8.7/10, SD = 1.9) and most RDs (84.5%) had received training on an NCA. Salient beliefs included advantages (e.g., improved behaviour change in patients) and disadvantages (e.g., inadequate time). Normative referents included colleagues (e.g., multidisciplinary team), managers, patients/clients, College of RDs of Alberta, and counsellors. The barriers and enablers were related to patients’ situations, infrastructure, and RD supports.
Conclusions: These results may enable decision makers to more effectively design and target training and implementation programs to improve RDs’ NCA.

Résumé

Objectif. Cette étude décrit l’utilisation que font les diététistes des techniques de counseling en nutrition (TCN) définies dans la terminologie du processus de soins en nutrition (TPSN) de l’Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics des États-Unis de même que leurs perceptions relativement à ces techniques.
Méthodes. Une enquête transversale en ligne a été menée auprès d’environ 500 diététistes de l’Alberta, au Canada. Les items concernaient entre autres les données démographiques, les caractéristiques de l’emploi, la perception des connaissances, les compétences, l’utilisation de TCN, la formation et les croyances fondamentales quant à la théorie du comportement planifié. Dans les analyses descriptives, les diététistes qui offraient des conseils à « tous ou presque tous » leurs clients ont été comparés à ceux qui offraient des conseils à « certains ou aucun » de leurs clients. Les croyances fondamentales ont été analysées au moyen d’une analyse de contenu.
Résultats. Sur les 349 diététistes ayant répondu au sondage, 64,2 % utilisaient des TCN auprès de « tous ou presque tous » leurs patients. Les diététistes étaient disposés à utiliser des TCN (moyenne = 8,7/10; écart-type = 1,9) et la plupart (84,5 %) avaient reçu une formation à ce sujet. Les croyances fondamentales comprenaient les avantages (p. ex., amélioration du changement de comportement chez les patients) et les désavantages (p. ex., manque de temps). Les référents normatifs incluaient les collègues (p. ex., l’équipe multidisciplinaire), les gestionnaires, les patients/clients, le College of Dietitians of Alberta et des conseillers. Les obstacles et les facteurs facilitants étaient liés aux situations des patients, à l’infrastructure et au soutien que recevaient les diététistes.
Conclusions. Ces résultats pourraient permettre aux décideurs de concevoir et de cibler plus efficacement la formation et les programmes de mise œuvre visant à améliorer les TCN employées par les diététistes.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Financial support: All funds for this study were internally provided from Nutrition Services, Alberta Health Services.
Conflict of interest: The authors have no conflict of interest.

References

1
American Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. International dietetics & nutrition terminology (IDNT) manual: standardized language for the nutrition care process. 4th ed. Chicago, IL; 2012.
2
Desroches S, Lapointe A, Ratte S, Gravel K, Legare F, and Turcotte S Interventions to enhance adherence to dietary advice for preventing and managing chronic diseases in adults Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013 2 CD008722
3
Karmali S, Brar B, Shi X, Sharma AM, de Gara C, and Birch DW Weight recidivism post-bariatric surgery: a systematic review Obes Surg 2013 23 11 1922 -33
4
Spahn JM, Reeves RS, Keim KS, Laquatra I, Kellogg M, Jortberg B, et al. State of the evidence regarding behavior change theories and strategies in nutrition counseling to facilitate health and food behavior change J Am Diet Assoc 2010 110 6 879 -91
5
Brug J, Spikmans F, Aartsen C, Breedveld B, Bes R, and Fereira I Training dietitians in basic motivational interviewing skills results in changes in their counseling style and in lower saturated fat intakes in their patients J Nutr Educ Behav 2007 39 1 8 -12
6
Dietitians of Canada. IDNT on the radar; 2014 [cited 2014 Sep 21]. Available from: http://www.dietitians.ca/Knowledge-Center/Publications/Newsletter-Article.aspx?id=488.
7
Cant RP and Aroni RA Exploring dietitians’ verbal and nonverbal communication skills for effective dietitian-patient communication J Hum Nutr Diet 2008 21 5 502 -11
8
Maclellan DL and Berenbaum S Dietitians’ opinions and experiences of client-centred nutrition counselling Can J Diet Pract Res 2006 67 3 119 -24
9
Maclellan DL and Berenbaum S Client-centred nutrition counselling: do we know what this means? Can J Diet Pract Res 2003 64 1 12 -15
10
Deschenes SM, Gagnon MP, Legare F, Lapointe A, Turcotte S, and Desroches S Psychosocial factors of dietitians’ intentions to adopt shared decision making behaviours: a cross-sectional survey PLoS One 2013 8 5 e64523
11
Desroches S, Lapointe A, Deschenes SM, Gagnon MP, and Legare F Exploring dietitians’ salient beliefs about shared decision-making behaviors Implement Sci 2011 6 57
12
Ajzen I The theory of planned behavior Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1991 50 179 -211
13
Armitage C and Connor M Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: a meta-analytic review Br J Soc Psychol 2001 40 471 -99
14
Dillman DA, Smyth JD, Christian LM. Internet, mail and mixed-mode surveys. 3rd ed. Wiley, Hoboken N.J.; 2009.
15
Lu AH and Dollahite J Assessment of dietitians’ nutrition counselling self-efficacy and its positive relationship with reported skill usage J Hum Nutr Diet 2010 23 2 144 -53
16
Ajzen I. Constructing a TPB questionnaire: conceptual and methodological considerations; 2002 [cited 2014 Sep 21]. Available from: http://people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb.measurement.pdf.
17
Legare F, Ratte S, Stacey D, Kryworuchko J, Gravel K, Graham ID, et al. Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010 5 CD006732
18
Miller WR and Mount KA A small study of training in motivational interviewing: does one workshop change clinician and client behaviour? Behav Cogn Psychother 2001 29 457 -71
19
Miller WR, Yahne CE, Moyers TB, Martinez J, and Pirritano M A randomized trial of methods to help clinicians learn motivational interviewing J Consult Clin Psychol 2004 72 6 1050 -62
20
Bell KE, Hall F, Pager S, Kuipers P, and Farry H Developing allied health professional support policy in Queensland: a case study Hum Resour Health 2014 12 57
21
Joosten EA, DeFuentes-Merillas L, de Weert GH, Sensky T, van der Staak CP, and de Jong CA Systematic review of the effects of shared decision-making on patient satisfaction, treatment adherence and health status Psychother Psychosom 2008 77 4 219 -26
22
O’Connor AM, Stacey D, Entwistle V, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Rovner D, Holmes-Rovner M, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003 2 CD001431
23
Thompson-Leduc P, Clayman ML, Turcotte S, and Legare F Shared decision-making behaviours in health professionals: a systematic review of studies based on the theory of planned behaviour Health Expect 2015 18 5 754 -74
24
Vaillancourt H, Legare F, Gagnon MP, Lapointe A, Deschenes SM, and Desroches S Exploration of shared decision-making processes among dieticians and patients during a consultation for the nutritional treatment of dyslipidaemia Health Expect 2015 18 6 2764 -75

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Table (cjdpr-2016-004suppl.pdf)

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

cover image Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research
Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research
Volume 77Number 3September 2016
Pages: 140 - 147

History

Version of record online: 16 May 2016

Authors

Affiliations

Lorian M. Taylor PhD, RD
Alberta Health Services, Nutrition Services, Edmonton, AB
Stephanie Moriartey PhD, RD
Alberta Health Services, Nutrition Services, Edmonton, AB
Janet Stadnyk BSc, RD
Alberta Health Services, Nutrition Services, Edmonton, AB
Carlota Basualdo-Hammond MSc, MPH, RD
Alberta Health Services, Nutrition Services, Edmonton, AB

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Other Metrics

Citations

Cite As

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

1. Implementing a Clinical Practice Change: Adopting the Nutrition Care Process
2. Evaluation of a Patient Experience Tool in Dietetic Practice: Validation and Clinical Usage of the Assessment of Registered Dietitian Care Survey (ARCS)

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Subscribe

Click on the button below to subscribe to Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research

Purchase options

Purchase this article to get full access to it.

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

View options

PDF

View PDF

Full Text

View Full Text

Media

Media

Other

Tables

Share Options

Share

Share the article link

Share on social media