Undergraduate, Female, Nutrition Students’ Perceptions of Curricular Influence on Attitudes toward Individuals with Obesity

Publication: Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research
19 July 2016

Abstract

Purpose: This qualitative study, guided by a phenomenological approach, explored senior-level undergraduate, nutrition students’ perceptions of how obesity and weight bias were addressed in the undergraduate curricula and how the curricula influenced their attitudes toward individuals with obesity.
Methods: Twenty senior-level undergraduate, nutrition students from the University of Guelph participated in interviews. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis entailed open, axial, and selective coding.
Results: Participants’ sources of information about obesity in the curricula included nutrition courses, case studies, and non-nutrition courses. Regarding sources of information about weight bias in the curricula, they discussed nutrition courses, non-nutrition courses, and limited coverage of weight bias. Themes for curricular influence on attitudes toward people with obesity were increased knowledge of obesity, understanding the complexity of obesity, increased empathy toward individuals with obesity, and better ability to avoid stereotypes toward people with obesity.
Conclusions: The perceptions among nutrition students varied regarding the amount and type of obesity and weight-bias information in the curricula, as well as the influence of the curricula on attitudes toward individuals with obesity, suggesting that obesity and weight bias warrant more coordinated coverage in the nutrition curricula.

Résumé

Objectif. Cette étude qualitative, guidée par une approche phénoménologique, a exploré la perception des finissants du premier cycle en nutrition sur la manière dont l’obésité et les préjugés par rapport au poids ont été abordés dans leur programme universitaire de premier cycle et sur la manière dont le programme a influencé leur attitude envers les personnes obèses.
Méthodes. Au total, 20 finissants du premier cycle en nutrition de l’Université de Guelph ont participé aux entrevues. Les entrevues ont été enregistrées sur bande audio et transcrites textuellement. L’analyse thématique comprenait un codage ouvert, axial et sélectif.
Résultats. Les sources d’information des participants au sujet de l’obésité dans leur programme comprenaient les cours de nutrition, les études de cas et les cours dans un domaine autre que la nutrition. Concernant les sources d’information relatives aux préjugés par rapport au poids dans leur programme, ils ont mentionné les cours de nutrition, les cours dans un domaine autre que la nutrition et la couverture limitée des préjugés par rapport au poids. Les thèmes abordés concernant l’influence du programme sur leur attitude à l’égard des personnes obèses étaient la connaissance de l’obésité, la compréhension de la complexité de l’obésité, l’empathie accrue envers les personnes obèses et une meilleure capacité à éviter les stéréotypes envers les personnes obèses.
Conclusions. La perception des étudiants en nutrition sur la quantité et le type d’information qu’ils ont reçue sur l’obésité et les préjugés par rapport au poids dans leur programme varie, ainsi que l’influence de leur programme sur leur attitude envers les personnes obèses. Cela suggère que l’obésité et les préjugés par rapport au poids méritent une couverture plus coordonnée dans le programme de nutrition.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Sources of financial support: None.
Conflicts of interest: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1
Oberrider H, Walker R, Monroe D, and Adeyanju M Attitude of dietetics students and registered dietitians toward obesity J Am Diet Assoc 1995 95 8 914 -16
2
Puhl R, Wharton C, and Heuer C Weight bias among dietetic students: implications for treatment practices J Am Diet Assoc 2009 109 3 438 -44
3
Berry TR, Elfeddali I, and de Vries H Changing fit and fat bias using an implicit retraining task Psychol Health 2014 29 7 796 -812
4
Diedrichs PC and Barlow FK How to lose weight bias fast! Evaluating a brief anti-weight bias intervention Brit J Health Psych 2011 16 846 -61
5
Kobayashi M, Uesugi S, and Hikosaka R Relationship between professional experience as a practicing dietitian and lifestyle and dietary habits among graduates of a department of food science and nutrition Nutr Food Sci 2015 45 5 716 -27
6
Puhl RM and Heuer CA The stigma of obesity: a review and update Obesity 2009 17 5 941 -64
7
Berryman DE, Dubale GM, Manchester DS, and Mittelstaedt R Dietetics students possess negative attitudes toward obesity similar to nondietetic students J Am Diet Assoc 2006 106 10 1678 -82
8
Robinson EL, Ball LE, and Leveritt MD Obesity bias among health and non-health students attending an Australian university and their perceived obesity education J Nutr Educ Behav 2014 46 5 390 -5
9
Swift JA, Hanlon S, El-Redy L, Puhl RM, and Glaxebrook C Weight bias among UK trainee dietitians, doctors, nurses and nutritionists J Hum Nutr Diet 2013 26 395 -402
10
Atkins J and Gingras J Coming and going: dietetic students’ experience of their education Can J Diet Prac Res 2009 70 4 181 -6
11
Hein SF and Auston WJ Empirical and hermeneutic approaches to phenomenological research in psychology: a comparison Psychol Methods 2001 6 1 3 -17
12
Wertz FJ, Charmaz K, McMullen LM, Josselson R, Anderson R, McSpaddwn E. Five ways of doing qualitative analysis. New York: The Guilford Press; 2011.
13
Service Canada. Dietitian and nutritionists; 2015 [cited 2016 Feb 5] Available from: http://www.servicecanada.gc.ca/eng/qc/job_futures/statistics/3132.shtml.
14
Neuman WL, Robson K. Basics of social research: qualitative and quantitative approaches. 3rd Canadian ed. Toronto, ON: Pearson Education Inc.; 2015.
15
Flick U. An introduction to qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998.
16
Morse JM, Richards L. Readme first for a user’s guide to qualitative methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2002.
17
Lincoln YS and Guba EG But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation New Dir Eval 2007 114 15 -25
18
Guest G, MacQueen KM, Namey EE. Applied thematic analysis. Los Angeles, CA: Sage; 2012.
19
Puhl RM, Moss-Racusin CA, and Schwartz MB Internalization of weight bias: implications for binge eating and emotional well-being Obesity 2008 15 1 19 -23
20
Leung L Validity, reliability, and generalizability in qualitative research J Fam Med Prim Care 2015 4 3 324 -7
21
Crouch M and McKenzie H The logic of small samples in interview-based qualitative research Soc Sci Inform 2006 45 4 483 -99

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

cover image Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research
Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research
Volume 77Number 4December 2016
Pages: 177 - 182

History

Version of record online: 19 July 2016

Authors

Affiliations

John J. M. Dwyer PhD
Department of Family Relations and Applied Nutrition, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON
Andrea Starr MSc
Department of Family Relations and Applied Nutrition, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON
Christine Mills BASc
Department of Family Relations and Applied Nutrition, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON
Jess Haines PhD, RD
Department of Family Relations and Applied Nutrition, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Other Metrics

Citations

Cite As

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

1. Acceptability of an Online Module Addressing Weight Bias: Perspectives and Attitudes of Undergraduate Health Students and Instructors
2. Weight Inclusive Practice: Shifting the Focus from Weight to Social Justice

View Options

Login options

Check if you access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Subscribe

Click on the button below to subscribe to Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research

Purchase options

Purchase this article to get full access to it.

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

View options

PDF

View PDF

Full Text

View Full Text

Media

Media

Other

Tables

Share Options

Share

Share the article link

Share on social media