Children’s Perceptions of the Ontario Student Nutrition Program (OSNP) in Southwestern Ontario, Canada
Publication: Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research
9 March 2023
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to explore children’s lived experiences with the Ontario Student Nutrition Program (OSNP), a free, school-based snack program implemented in elementary schools in Southwestern, Ontario, Canada, to gain insights into future school food programs (SFP).
Methods: Focus group discussions (n=17) were conducted with 105 children in Grades 5 to 8 in seven elementary schools. Focus groups were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded for themes using inductive content analysis.
Results: Overall, children appreciated the OSNP and felt that it filled a need in students. Children also reported a willingness to try novel food items. For future SFPs, participants recommended that input be sought from children to ensure food preferences were considered. Children also discussed wanting more appealing food offerings that may include some choice. Finally, children also mentioned wanting a fair and equitable distribution of food in classrooms.
Conclusions: Children appreciated the OSNP and reported benefits to themselves and their peers. They also provided some valuable recommendations for future SFPs. If a nationally funded SFP is to be considered in Canada, children expressed the need to make the program equitable, while still allowing schools the flexibility to meet their unique needs and preferences.
Résumé
Objectif : Cette étude visait à explorer les expériences vécues par des enfants dans le cadre du Programme d’alimentation saine pour les élèves (PASE) de l’Ontario, un programme de collations gratuit mis en œuvre dans les écoles élémentaires du sud-ouest de l’Ontario, au Canada, pour obtenir leur avis en vue de futurs programmes d’alimentation dans les écoles (PAE).
Méthodes : Des séances en groupes de discussion (n = 17) ont été menées auprès de 105 enfants de la 5e à la 8e année dans 7 écoles élémentaires. Les discussions ont été enregistrées sur bande audio, transcrites et codées par thèmes au moyen d’une analyse de contenu inductive.
Résultats : Dans l’ensemble, les enfants appréciaient le PASE et sentaient qu’il répondait à un besoin chez les élèves. Les enfants ont également dit vouloir essayer de nouveaux aliments. Pour les futurs PAE, les participants recommandent de demander l’avis des enfants afin de prendre en compte les préférences alimentaires. Les enfants ont également dit souhaiter qu’on leur offre des aliments plus attrayants et un plus grand choix. Enfin, les enfants ont également mentionné vouloir une distribution juste et équitable des aliments en classe.
Conclusions : Les enfants ont aimé le PASE et ont mentionné des avantages pour eux-mêmes et pour leurs pairs. Ils ont également formulé des recommandations utiles pour de futurs PAE. Si la mise en œuvre au Canada d’un PAE financé à l’échelle nationale est envisagée, les enfants ont exprimé le besoin qu’il soit équitable, tout en laissant aux écoles la flexibilité nécessaire pour répondre à leurs besoins et préférences uniques.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Funding: This work was supported by Weston Foundation (SFI16-LOI-064).
Conflict of interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
REFERENCES
1
Olsho LE, Klerman JA, Ritchie L, Wakimoto P, Webb KL, and Bartlett S. Increasing child fruit and vegetable intake: Findings from the US Department of Agriculture Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015;115(8):1283–90. Epub 2015/03/10.
2
Gold A, Larson M, Tucker J, and Strang M. Classroom nutrition education combined with fruit and vegetable taste testing improves children’s dietary intake. J Sch Health. 2017;87(2):106–13.
3
Reinaerts E, de Nooijer J, Candel M, and de Vries N. Increasing children’s fruit and vegetable consumption: distribution or a multicomponent programme? Public Health Nutr. 2007;10(9):939–47.
4
He M, Beynon C, Sangster Bouck M, St Onge R, Stewart S, Khoshaba L, et al. Impact evaluation of the Northern Fruit and Vegetable Pilot Programme - a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Public Health Nutr. 2009;12(11):2199–208. Epub 2009/05/30.
5
Skinner K, Hanning RM, Metatawabin J, Martin ID, and Tsuji LJS. Impact of a school snack program on the dietary intake of grade six to ten First Nation students living in a remote community in Northern Ontario, Canada. Rural Remote Health. 2012;12(2122):1–17.
6
Blanchette L and Brug J. Determinants of fruit and vegetable consumption among 6-12-year-old children and effective interventions to increase consumption. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2005;18(6):431–43.
7
Hector D, Edwards S, Gale J, and Ryan H. Achieving equity in Crunch & Sip(®): a pilot intervention of supplementary free fruit and vegetables in NSW classrooms. Health Promot J Austr. 2017;28(3):238–42. Epub 2017/12/19.
8
Gates A, Hanning RM, Gates M, Isogai AD, Metatawabin J, and Tsuji LJS. A School nutrition program improves vegetable and fruit knowledge, preferences, and exposure in First Nation youth. Open Nutr J 2011;5:1–6.
9
Libman K. Growing youth growing food: how vegetable gardening influences young people’s food consciousness and eating habits. Appl Environ Edu Commun. 2007;6(1):87–95.
10
Triador L, Farmer A, Maximova K, Willows N, and Kootenay J. A school gardening and healthy snack program increased Aboriginal First Nations children’s preferences toward vegetables and fruit. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2015;47(2):176–80. Epub 2014/12/03.
11
Martorell H. Canadian policy interventions supporting healthy eating in schools. Food: Locally Embedded Globally Engaged (FLEdGE) and Food Secure Canada. 2017:1–14.
12
Ismail MR, Matthews JI, Gilliland JA, and Battram DS. Process evaluation of the Centrally Procured School Food Program in Ontario, Canada: School-level perspectives. Health Educ Res. 2021; 36 (5): 554–567.
13
He M, Beynon CE, Gritke JL, Henderson ML, Kurtz JM, Sangster Bouck M, et al. Children’s perceptions of the Northern Fruit and Vegetable Program in Ontario, Canada. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2012;44(6):592–6. Epub 2011/07/05.
14
Colley P, Miller L, Seabrook JA, Woodruff SJ, and Gilliland J. Children’s perceptions of a Centrally Procured School Food Program in Southwestern Ontario, Canada. Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2021;41(4):131–7. Epub 2021/04/15.
15
Coyle K, Potter S, Schneider D, May G, Robin L, Seymour J, et al. Distributing free fresh fruit and vegetables at school: Results of a pilot outcome evaluation. Public Health Rep. 2009;124(5):660–9.
16
Potter S, Schneider D, Coyle K, May G, Robin L, and Seymour J. What works? Process evaluation of a school-based fruit and vegetable distribution program In Mississippi. J Sch Health. 2011;81(4):202–11.
17
Jamelske E and Bica L. The USDA Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program: A case study of implementation and consumption in Wisconsin. J Child Nutr Manag. 2014;38(2):1–8.
18
Ismail MR, Seabrook JA, and Gilliland JA. Process evaluation of fruit and vegetables distribution interventions in school-based settings: A systematic review. Prev Med Rep. 2021;21(101281):1–10. Epub 2020/12/29.
19
Margolin A, Goto K, Wolff C, and Bianco S. Let’s Talk Food: Elementary school students’ perceptions of school and home food environment and the impact of the Harvest of the Month Program on their dietary attitudes and behaviors. Int J Child, Youth Fam Stud. 2018;8(3/4):154–67.
20
Spencer RA, McIsaac JD, Stewart M, Brushett S, and Kirk SFL. Food in focus: Youth exploring food in schools using photovoice. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2019;51(8):1011–9. Epub 2019/06/19.
21
Wind M, Bjelland M, Perez-Rodrigo C, te Velde SJ, Hildonen C, Bere E, et al. Appreciation and implementation of a school-based intervention are associated with changes in fruit and vegetable intake in 10- to 13-year old schoolchildren-the Pro Children study. Health Educ Res. 2008;23(6):997–1007.
22
Lin Y-C and Fly AD. Student feedback to improve the United States Department of Agriculture Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program. Nutr Res Pract 2016;10(3):321–327.
23
Ontario Student Nutrition Program [OSNP]. Ontario’s Student Nurtition Program Guidelines. 2018. [cited 2023 Mar 02] Available from: https://studentnutritionontario.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/2018_SNP_Program_Guidelines_ENG.pdf.
24
Kreuger, RA. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research 2nd Edition. Hills, CA: Breverley Sage publications. 1994.
25
Kennedy C, Kools S, and Krueger R. Methodological considerations in children’s focus group. Nurs Res. 2001;50(3):184–7.
26
Morrison-Beedy D, Cote-Arsenault D, and Feinstein NF. Maximizing results with focus groups: Moderator and analysis issues. Appl Nurs Res. 2001;14(1):48–53. Epub 2001/02/15.
27
Braun V and Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.
28
Merriam SB. Qualitative research: A guide to design and implmentation San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass; 2009.
29
Patton MQ. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 2nd Edition ed. London: Sage Publications; 1990.
30
The Coalition for Healthy School Food. For a Universal Healthy School Food Program: Presented by the Members and Supporters of the Coaltion for Healthy School Food. 2018.
31
Ke J, Ford-Jones L. Food insecurity and hunger: A review of the effects on children’s health and behaviour. Paed Child Health 2015;20(2):89–91.
32
McIsaac JD, Read K, Williams PL, Raine KD, Veugelers PJ, and Kirk SFL. Reproducing or reducing inequity? Considerations for school food programs. Can J Diet Pract Res. 2018;79(1):18–22. Epub 2017/10/04.
33
Ricciuto L, Tarasuk V, and Yatchew A. Socio-demographic influences on food purchasing among Canadian households. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2006;60(6):778–90. Epub 2006/01/19.
34
McIntyre L, Travers K, and Dayle J. Children’s feeding programs in Atlantic Canada: reducing or reproducing inequities? Can J Public Health. 1999;90(3):196–200.
35
Raine K, McIntyre L, and Dayle JB. The failure of charitable school- and community-based nutrition programmes to feed hungry children. Crit Public Health. 2003;13(2):155–69.
36
Taylor JP, Evers S, and McKenna M. Determinants of healthy eating in children and youth. Can J Public Health. 2005;96:S20–S26.
37
Rolls BJ, Ello-Martin JA, and Carlton Tohill B. What can intervention studies tell us about the relationship between fruit and vegetable consumption and weight management? Nutr Rev. 2004;62(1):1–17.
38
Brug J and Tak NI, te Velde SJ, Bere E, de Bourdeaudhuij I. Taste preferences, liking and other factors related to fruit and vegetable intakes among schoolchildren: results from observational studies. Br J Nutr. 2008;99 Suppl 1:S7–S14. Epub 2008/04/09.
39
Cooke L. The importance of exposure for healthy eating in childhood: a review. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2007;20(4):294–301.
40
Lobos P and Januszewicz A. Food neophobia in children. Pediatr Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2019;25(3):150–4. Epub 2019/11/27.
41
Guzek D, Glabska D, Lange E, and Jezewska-Zychowicz M. A Polish Study on the influence of food neophobia in children (10-12 Years Old) on the intake of vegetables and fruits. Nutrients. 2017;9(6). Epub 2017/06/03.
42
Aarestrup A, Krolner R, Suldrup-Jorgensen T, Evans A, Due P, and Tjornhoj-Thomsen T. Implementing a free school-based fruit and vegetable programme: Barriers and facilitators experienced by pupils, teachers and produce suppliers in the Boost study. BMC Public Health. 2014;14(146):1–15.
43
Aarestrup A, Suldrup Jorgensen T, Jorgensen SE, Hoelscher DM, Due P, and Krolner R. Implementation of strategies to increase adolescents’ access to fruit and vegetables at school: process evaluation findings from the Boost study. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:86. Epub 2015/04/17.
44
Bai Y, Feldman C, Wunderlich SM, and Aletras S. Process evaluation of the Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program implmentation in a New Jersey elementary school. J Child Nutr Manag 2011;35(2):1–10.
45
Russell JA, Evers S, Dwyer JM, Uetrecht C, and Macaskill L. Best practices among child nutrition programs in Ontario: Evaluation findings. J Hunger Environ Nutr. 2008;2(2-3):111–27.
46
Knai C, Pomerleau J, Lock K, and McKee M. Getting children to eat more fruit and vegetables: a systematic review. Prev Med. 2006;42(2):85–95.
Supplementary Material
File (cjdpr-2022-042suppla.docx)
- Download
- 17.89 KB
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research
Volume 84 • Number 3 • September 2023
Pages: 171 - 175
Editor: Naomi Cahill
History
Version of record online: 9 March 2023
Copyright
© 2023.
Key Words
Mots-clés
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Other Metrics
Citations
Cite As
Mariam R.IsmailPhD, Jason A.GillilandPhD, June I.MatthewsPhD RD PHEc, JenniferBeverleyMSc RD, and Danielle S.BattramPhD, RD, PHEc. 2023. Children’s Perceptions of the Ontario Student Nutrition Program (OSNP) in Southwestern Ontario, Canada. Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research.
84(3): 171-175. https://doi.org/10.3148/cjdpr-2022-042
Export Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
1. Nutrition and Learning: An Interdependent Relationship
View Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Subscribe
Click on the button below to subscribe to Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research
