University Students Harvesting the Benefits of a Garden Laboratory

Publication: Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research
20 April 2021

Abstract

Community gardens (CG) are areas of land where individuals or groups grow food in single or shared plots, typically in an urban setting, providing fresh produce, urban greening, and opportunities to socialize and improve the community. The purpose of this descriptive study was to introduce a CG laboratory (lab) as part of an introductory foods course within a nutrition program and explore how the lab influenced students’ learning and overall experiences. Forty-one students, 2 lab instructors, and 3 student volunteers who tended the CG participated in the survey. Survey analysis revealed 4 interrelated themes: (i) connection and exposure, (ii) food preparation, (iii) benefits of using local food, and (iv) explicit learning. Overall, the lab fostered multiple types of individual and relational learning involving the acquisition of course content and food literacy skills. The CG was valued by students as a curriculum component as well as opportunities for personal growth and development. With the growing importance of food systems knowledge to the profession, CG may act as a site for embodied forms of learning in nutrition programs.

Résumé

Les jardins communautaires (JC) sont des portions de terre où des personnes ou des groupes cultivent des aliments sur des parcelles individuelles ou partagées, généralement en milieu urbain, favorisant ainsi l’offre de fruits et légumes frais, l’écologisation urbaine, et les possibilités de socialiser et d’améliorer la communauté. L’objectif de cette étude descriptive était de présenter un laboratoire de JC (labo) dans le cadre d’un cours d’introduction sur les aliments au sein d’un programme de nutrition et d’explorer comment le labo influençait l’apprentissage et les expériences globales des étudiants. En tout, 41 étudiants, 2 moniteurs de laboratoire et 3 étudiants bénévoles s’occupant du JC ont participé au sondage. L’analyse du sondage a révélé 4 thèmes interreliés : (i) connexion et exposition, (ii) préparation des aliments, (iii) avantages de l’alimentation locale, et (iv) apprentissage explicite. Dans l’ensemble, le labo favorisait de multiples types d’apprentissages individuels et relationnels impliquant l’acquisition du contenu du cours et des compétences en littératie alimentaire. Les étudiants appréciaient le JC comme composante du curriculum et le considéraient comme une occasion de développement et de croissance personnels. Avec l’importance croissante de la connaissance des systèmes alimentaires pour la profession, le JC pourrait servir de site pour des formes d’apprentissage concrètes dans le cadre de programmes de nutrition.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Financial support: The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Conflicts of interest: The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1
Dietitians of Canada. Community food security: positions of Dietitians of Canada; 2007 [cited 2019 Mar]. Available from: https://www.dietitians.ca/foodinsecurity.
2
Kingsley J, Foenander E, and Bailey A. “You feel like you’re part of something bigger”: exploring motivations for community garden participation in Melbourne, Australia. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):745.
3
Finlay J and Massey J. Eco-campus: applying the ecocity model to develop green university and college campuses. Intern J Sustain. 2012;13(2):150–65.
4
Colding J and Barthel S. The role of university campuses in reconnecting humans to the biosphere. Sustainability. 2017;9(12):2349.
5
Anderson C, Maher J, and Wright H. Building sustainable university-based community gardens: volunteer perceptions of enablers and barriers to engagement and benefits received from volunteering in the moving feast. Cogent Soc Sci. 2018;4(1):1–19.
6
Krasny ME and Tidball KG. Community gardens as contexts for science, stewardship, and civic action learning. CATE. 2009;2(1):1–18.
7
Aftandilian D and Dart L. Using garden-based service-learning to work toward food justice, better educate students, and strengthen campus-community ties. JCES. 2013;6(1):55–69.
8
Hoffman AJ, Knight LFM, and Wallach J. Gardening activities, education, and self-esteem. Urban Educ. 2007;42(5):403–11.
9
Ridgeway N and Matthews J. Campus gardens: food production or sense of place? CFS. 2015;2(1):99–118.
10
De Young R, Scheuer K, Roush J, Kozeleski K. Student interest in campus community gardens: sowing the seeds for direct engagement with sustainability. In: Filho L, Zint M, editors. The contribution of social sciences to sustainable development at universities. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2016. p. 161–75.
11
Pedersen RL and Robinson Z. Reviewing university community gardens for sustainability: taking stock, comparisons with urban community gardens and mapping research opportunities. Local Environ. 2018;23(6):652–71.
12
Krasny ME and Delia J. Natural area stewardship as part of campus sustainability. J Clean Prod. 2015;106:87–96.
13
Manry J, Mills S, and Ochs D. Combatting food insecurity on a mid-sized public university campus in the Midwest. IJIER. 2017;5(6):67–74.
14
Mount Saint Vincent University. The mount community garden; 2020 [cited 2020 May 2]. Available from: https://www.msvu.ca/about-msvu/sustainability-at-the-mount/the-mount-community-garden/.
15
Jackson SL. Research methods and statistics: a critical thinking approach. 3rd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth; 2009.
16
Clarke V, Braun V, Terry G, Hayfield N. Thematic analysis. In: Liamputtong P, editor. Handbook of research methods in health and social sciences. Singapore: Springer; 2019. p. 843–60.
17
Sundler AJ, Lindberg E, Nilsson C, and Palmér L. Qualitative thematic analysis based on descriptive phenomenology. Nursing Open. 2019;6(3):733–9.
18
Boyatzis RE. Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1998.
19
D’Abundo ML and Carden AM. “Growing wellness”: the possibility of promoting collective wellness through community garden education programs. Commun Dev J. 2008;39(4):83–94.
20
Vanderslice K. Making and breaking: an embodied ethnography of eating. Grad J Food Stud. 2017;4(1):31–41.
21
Datta R. Community garden: a bridging program between formal and informal learning. Cogent Educ. 2016;3:1177154.
22
Levkoe CZ. Learning democracy through food justice movements. Agric Hum Values. 2006;23:89–98.
23
Cumbers A, Shaw D, Crossan J, and McMaster R. The work of community gardens: reclaiming place for community in the city. Work Employ Soc. 2018;32(1):133–49.
24
van der Veen M. The materiality of plants: plant-people entanglements. World Archaeol. 2016;46(5):799–812.
25
O’Kane G. A moveable feast: contemporary relational food cultures emerging from local food networks. Appetite. 2016;105:218–31.
26
Waisman MS. Dietitians of Canada Cook!: 275 recipes celebrate food from field to table. 1st ed. Toronto, ON: Robert Rose Inc.; 2011.
27
Lordly D and Dubé N. The who, what, when, and how of choosing a dietetics career. Can J Diet Pract Res. 2012;73(4):169–75.
28
MacLellan D, Lordly D, and Gingras J. Professional socialization in dietetics: a review of the literature. Can J Diet Pract Res. 2011;72(1):37–42.
29
Thomas HMc and Irwin JD. Cook It Up! A community-based cooking program for at-risk youth: overview of a food literacy intervention. BMC Res Notes. 2011;4:495.
30
Edwards-Jones G. Does eating local food reduce the environmental impact of food production and enhance consumer health? Proc Nutr Soc. 2010;69(4):582–91.
31
Schnell SM. Food miles, local eating, and community supported agriculture: putting local food in its place. Agric Hum Values. 2013;30(4):615–28.
32
Cheang CC, Wing-Mui WS, Zhan Y, and Tsoi KH. Education for sustainability using a campus eco-garden as a learning environment. Int J Sustain High Educ. 2017;18(2):242–62.
33
Dietitians of Canada. Sustainable food systems: dietitians’ roles; 2020 Jan [cited 2020 Aug 7]. Available from: https://www.dietitians.ca/DietitiansOfCanada/media/Documents/Resources/Sustainable-Food-Systems-Dietitians-Roles-(Role-Paper).pdf?ext=.pdf.
34
Prankhurst KV and Livingstone DW. The labour process: individual learning, work and productivity. Stud Contin Educ. 2006;28(1):1–16.
35
Slater J, Falkenberg T, Rutherford J, and Colatruglio S. Food literacy competencies: a conceptual framework for youth transitioning to adulthood. Int J Consum Stud. 2018;42:547–56.
36
FoodLiteracy.ca. Toronto, ON: Ontario Dietitians of Public Health; c2020 [cited 2020 May 4]. Available from: https://www.odph.ca/food-literacy-1.
37
Dietitians of Canada. Practice Summary: Sustainable Food Systems that Promote Healthy Diets: A proposed Roadmap for Dietetic Practice. Available from: https://www.dietitians.ca/DietitiansOfCanada/media/Documents/Resources/Sustainable-Food-Systems-Practice-Summary.pdf.
38
Wegener J. Equipping future generations of registered dietitian nutritionists and public health nutritionists: a commentary on education and training needs to promote sustainable food systems and practices in the 21st century. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018;118(3):393–8.
39
Canter DD, Moorachian ME, and Boyce J. The growing importance of food and culinary knowledge and skills in dietetics practice. Top Clin Nutr. 2007;22(4):313–22.
40
Begley A and Gallegos D. Should cooking be a dietetic competency? Nutr Diet. 2010;67:41–6.
41
Practice-Based Evidence in Nutrition (PEN). Knowledge pathways: food security; 2005 [cited 2020 Jul 12]. Available from: https://www.pennutrition.com/KnowledgePathway.aspx?kpid=15294&trid=19092&trcatid=38.
42
The Real Dirt on Farming. The real dirt on farming; 2011 [cited 2020 Jul 12]. Available from: http://www.realdirtonfarming.ca/.

Supplementary Material

File (cjdpr-2021-004suppla.docx)
File (cjdpr-2021-004supplb.docx)
File (cjdpr-2021-004supplc.docx)

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

cover image Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research
Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research
Volume 82Number 3September 2021
Pages: 107 - 114
Editor: Naomi Cahill

History

Version of record online: 20 April 2021

Authors

Affiliations

Jillian Ruhl MAHN
Department of Applied Human Nutrition, Mount Saint Vincent University, Halifax, NS
Daphne Lordly DEd
Department of Applied Human Nutrition, Mount Saint Vincent University, Halifax, NS

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Other Metrics

Citations

Cite As

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

There are no citations for this item

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Subscribe

Click on the button below to subscribe to Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research

Purchase options

Purchase this article to get full access to it.

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

View options

PDF

View PDF

Full Text

View Full Text

Media

Media

Other

Tables

Share Options

Share

Share the article link

Share on social media