Dietetic Students’ Perceptions of Learning Professional Competencies with Four Simulations Throughout a Semester
Publication: Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research
3 May 2022
Abstract
In nursing and medicine, taking part in simulation activities has been shown to be beneficial for students’ learning; however, little has been documented in dietetics. This study aimed to document the perceived effect of 4 simulations on development of professional competencies by dietetic students. A mixed-method convergent approach was used with pre- and post-questionnaires, interviews, and a focus group discussion to look at dietetic students’ perceptions of learning as part of a Nutrition Assessment course. Nonparametric tests for questionnaires and theme analysis for transcripts were used to examine data. After analysis, data were compared and merged for interpretation. Results showed that participants perceived a significant increase in comprehension of various competencies with simulations. In interviews and a focus group, a participant subgroup (n = 7) perceived an enriched understanding of some dietetic competencies compared with pre-simulations. Simulations seemed to have transformed classroom concepts to a more practical understanding of dietetic practice. More studies are needed to identify if these results could be replicated in different settings. Simulations had a positive effect on students’ perception of competencies development and may be an andragogical tool of choice to support preparing future dietitians for entry to practice.
Résumé
En sciences infirmières et en médecine, il a été démontré que les activités de simulation favorisent l’apprentissage chez les étudiants. Toutefois, peu a été documenté dans le domaine de la diététique. Cette étude visait à documenter les effets perçus par des étudiants en diététique de 4 simulations sur le développement de compétences professionnelles. Une approche convergente à méthode mixte (questionnaires avant et après, entrevues et groupe de discussion) a été utilisée pour examiner les perceptions d’étudiants en diététique sur l’apprentissage dans le cadre d’un cours d’évaluation nutritionnelle. Les données ont été examinées au moyen de tests non paramétriques pour les questionnaires et d’analyses thématiques pour les transcriptions. Après analyse, les données ont été comparées et fusionnées aux fins d’interprétation. Les résultats ont montré que les participants percevaient beaucoup mieux comprendre diverses compétences grâce aux simulations. Au cours des entrevues et d’une discussion de groupe, un sous-groupe de participants (n = 7) a affirmé mieux comprendre certaines compétences en diététique comparativement à avant les simulations. Les simulations semblent avoir traduit les concepts appris en classe en une compréhension plus pragmatique de la pratique de la diététique. Plus d’études sont requises afin de déterminer si ces résultats peuvent être reproduits dans d’autres contextes. Les simulations ont eu un effet positif sur la perception qu’ont les étudiants du développement de compétences et pourraient constituer un outil andragogique de choix pour préparer les futurs diététistes à leur entrée à la pratique.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Financial support: This research project received funding from the Consortium national de formation en santé – Volet Université d’Ottawa.
Conflicts of interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
1
Boet S, Granry J-C, Savoldelli G. La simulation en santé: De la théorie à la pratique. Paris: Springer; 2013.
2
Levett-Jones T and Lapkin S. A systematic review of the effectiveness of simulation debriefing in health professional education. Nurse Educ Today. 2013 Jun;34(6):e58–63.
3
Boet S, Jaffrelot M, Naik VN, Brien S, and Granry J-CC. La simulation en santé en Amérique du Nord: État actuel et évolution après deux décennies. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2014;33(5):353–7.
4
Poirier TI, Pailden J, Jhala R, Ronald K, Wilhelm M, and Fan J. Student self-assessment and faculty assessment of performance in an interprofessional error disclosure simulation training program. Am J Pharm Educ. 2017;81(3).
5
Dinther M van, Dochy F, and Segers M. Factors affecting students’ self-efficacy in higher education. Educ Res Rev. 2011 Jan;6(2):95–108.
6
Lancaster J and Bain A. The design of inclusive education courses and the self-efficacy of preservice teacher education students. Int J Disabil Dev Educ. 2007 Jun 11;54(2):245–56.
7
Palmer DH. Sources of self-efficacy in a science methods course for primary teacher education students. Res Sci Educ. 2006 Dec 19;36(4):337–53.
8
Papastergiou M. Enhancing physical education and sport science students’ self-efficacy and attitudes regarding information and communication technologies through a computer literacy course. Comput Educ. 2010 Jan;54(1):298–308.
9
Nijhuis JFH, Segers MSR, and Gijselaers WH. Influence of redesigning a learning environment on student perceptions and learning strategies. Learn Environ Res. 2005 Jan;8(1):67–93.
10
Segers M, Gijbels D, and Thurlings M. The relationship between students’ perceptions of portfolio assessment practice and their approaches to learning. Educ Stud. 2008 Feb;34(1):35–44.
11
Segers M, Nijhuis J, and Gijselaers W. Redesigning a learning and assessment environment: the influence on students’ perceptions of assessment demands and their learning strategies. Stud Educ Eval. 2006 Jan;32(3):223–42.
12
Struyven K, Dochy F, Janssens S, and Gielen S. On the dynamics of students’ approaches to learning: The effects of the teaching/learning environment. Learn Instr. 2006 Aug;16(4):279–94.
13
Partnership for Dietetic Education and Practice. Integrated competencies for dietetic education and practice (ICDEP). V2.0. Partnership for Dietetic Education and Practice [Internet]. 2013 [cited 4 Feb 2021] Available from: https://www.pdep.ca/tools/standards.aspx.
14
Gibbs H, George K, Barkley R, and Meyer M. Using multiple-patient simulations to facilitate interprofessional communication between dietetic and nursing tudents and improve nutrition care process skills. Top Clin Nutr. 2015;30(3):230–8.
15
Gibson S and Molloy E. Professional skill development needs of newly graduated health professionals: a systematic literature review. Focus Heal Prof Educ. 2012;13(3):71.
16
Henry BW, Duellman MC, and Smith TJ. Nutrition-based standardized patient sessions increased counseling awareness and confidence among dietetic interns. Top Clin Nutr. 2009;24(1):25–34.
17
Schwartz VS, Rothpletz-Puglia P, Denmark R, and Byham-Gray L. Comparison of standardized patients and real patients as an experiential teaching strategy in a nutrition counseling course for dietetic students. Patient Educ Couns. 2015;98(2):168–73.
18
Beshgetoor D and Wade D. Use of actors as simulated patients in nutritional counseling. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2007;39(2):101–2.
19
Farahat E, Javaherian-Dysinger H, Rice G, Schneider L, Daher N, and Heine N. Exploring students’ perceptions of the educational value of formative Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) in a nutrition program. J Allied Health, 2016;45(1):20–6.
20
Giroux I, Pauzé E, and Rosa M. Apprentissage par simulation : activité novatrice de formation interprofessionnelle sur la gestion de la dysphagie [Simulation-based learning: an innovative interprofessional education activity on dysphagia management]. Can J Diet Pract Res. 2019;81(1):44–48.
21
Krueger RA, Casey MAW. Focus groups : a practical guide for applied research. California: SAGE; 2009. 219 p.
22
L’Ecuyer R. Méthodologie de l’analyse développementale de contenu méthode GPS et concept de soi [Methodology of the developmental content analysis GSP method and self-concept]. Sillery: Presses de l’Université du Québec; 1990. 472 p.
23
Johnson B. Examining the validity structure of qualitative research. Education, 1997;118(2):282–92.
24
Holthaus V, Sergakis G, Rohrig L, Wilcox J, Thomas E, McClerking C, et al. The impact of interprofessional simulation on dietetic student perception of communication, decision making, roles, and self-efficacy. Top Clin Nutr. 2015;30(2):127–42.
25
Miles A, Friary P, Jackson B, Sekula J, and Braakhuis A. Simulation-based dysphagia training: Teaching interprofessional clinical reasoning in a hospital environment. Dysphagia, 2016;31(3):407–15.
26
Knapik M. The qualitative research interview: participants’ responsive participation in knowledge making. Int J Qual Methods, 2017;5(3):77–93.
27
Thompson KL and Gutschall MD. The time is now: a blueprint for simulation in dietetics education. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015 Feb;115(2):183–94.
28
Partnership for Dietetic Education and Practice. Integrated competencies for dietetic education and practice (ICDEP). Version 3.0. Partnership for Dietetic Education and Practice [Internet]. 2020. [cited 4 Feb 2021] Available from: https://www.pdep.ca/tools/standards.aspx.
Supplementary Material
File (cjdpr-2022-006suppla.docx)
- Download
- 67.10 KB
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research
Volume 83 • Number 3 • September 2022
Pages: 139 - 143
Editor: Naomi Cahill
History
Version of record online: 3 May 2022
Copyright
© 2022.
Key Words
Mots-clés
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Other Metrics
Citations
Cite As
MylèneRosaM.A.(ED), RD and IsabelleGirouxPhD, RD, BEd, PHEc, FDC. 2022. Dietetic Students’ Perceptions of Learning Professional Competencies with Four Simulations Throughout a Semester. Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research.
83(3): 139-143. https://doi.org/10.3148/cjdpr-2022-006
Export Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
There are no citations for this item
View Options
Login options
Check if you access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Subscribe
Click on the button below to subscribe to Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research
