Opportunities for Qualitative Analysis of Social Media Platforms in Dietetic Research and Practice

Publication: Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research
15 December 2020

Abstract

To date, most qualitative knowledge about individual eating patterns and the food environment has been derived from traditional data collection methods, such as interviews, focus groups, and observations. However, there currently exists a large source of nutrition-related data in social media discussions that have the potential to provide opportunities to improve dietetic research and practice. Qualitative social media discussion analysis offers a new tool for dietetic researchers and practitioners to gather insights into how the public discusses various nutrition-related topics. We first consider how social media discussion data come with significant advantages including low-cost access to timely ways to gather insights from the public, while also cautioning that social media data have limitations (e.g., difficulty verifying demographic information). We then outline 3 types of social media discussion platforms in particular: (i) online news article comment sections, (ii) food and nutrition blogs, and (iii) discussion forums. We discuss how each different type of social media offers unique insights and provide a specific example from our own research using each platform. We contend that social media discussions can contribute positively to dietetic research and practice.

Résumé

À ce jour, la plupart des connaissances qualitatives sur les habitudes alimentaires individuelles et l’environnement alimentaire sont issues de méthodes de collecte de données traditionnelles, comme les entrevues, les groupes de discussion et les observations. Cependant, il existe actuellement une vaste source de données liées à la nutrition dans les discussions sur les médias sociaux qui pourrait offrir des occasions d’améliorer la pratique et la recherche en diététique. L’analyse qualitative des discussions sur les médias sociaux offre un nouvel outil aux praticiens et aux chercheurs en diététique pour comprendre comment le public aborde les divers sujets liés à la nutrition. Nous explorons d’abord les avantages importants que présentent les données issues des discussions sur les médias sociaux, par exemple l’accès à faible coût à des moyens rapides de recueillir l’opinion du public, tout en reconnaissant que les données issues des médias sociaux ont leurs limites (p. ex. difficulté à vérifier les données démographiques). Nous présentons ensuite 3 types de plateformes de discussion sur les médias sociaux : (i) la section « commentaires » des articles d’actualité en ligne, (ii) les blogues sur les aliments et la nutrition, et (iii) les forums de discussion. Nous abordons comment chacun des types de médias sociaux offre un point de vue unique et donnons un exemple précis de notre propre recherche en utilisant chacune des plateformes. Nous croyons que les discussions sur les médias sociaux peuvent contribuer positivement à la pratique et à la recherche en diététique.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1
Twynstra J and Dworatzek P. Use of an experiential learning assignment to prepare future health professionals to utilize social media for nutrition communications. Can J Diet Pract Res. 2016 Mar;77(1):30–4.
2
O’Kane C, Wallace A, Wilson L, Annis A, Ma D, Haines J, et al. Family-based obesity prevention: perceptions of Canadian parents of preschool-age children. Can J Diet Pract Res. 2018 Mar;79(1):13–7.
3
Dexter B, Frank S, and Seguin L. How and where parents of infants and young children want to receive nutrition information. Can J Diet Pract Res. 2016 Dec;77(4):203–5.
4
Derbyshire E. Oily fish and omega-3s across the life stages: a focus on intakes and future directions. Front Nutr. 2019;6:165.
5
Statistics Canada. How are Canadians staying connected? Ottawa, ON: Statistics Canada; 2019 [cited 2020 Jul 22]. Available from: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/11-627-m/11-627-m2019063-eng.htm.
6
Caulfield T, Marcon AR, Murdoch B, Brown JM, Perrault ST, Jarry J, et al. Health misinformation and the power of narrative messaging in the public sphere. Can J Bioeth. 2019 Mar;2(2):52–60.
7
Bissonnette-Maheux V, Provencher V, Lapointe A, Dugrenier M, Dumas A-A, Pluye P, et al. Exploring women’s beliefs and perceptions about healthy eating blogs: a qualitative study. J Med Internet Res. 2015 Apr;17(4):e87.
8
Raggatt M, Wright CJC, Carrotte E, Jenkinson R, Mulgrew K, Prichard I, et al. “I aspire to look and feel healthy like the posts convey”: engagement with fitness inspiration on social media and perceptions of its influence on health and wellbeing. BMC Public Health. 2018 Aug;18(1):1002.
9
Bissonnette-Maheux V, Dumas A-A, Provencher V, Lapointe A, Dugrenier M, Straus S, et al. Women’s perceptions of usefulness and ease of use of four healthy eating blog characteristics: a qualitative study of 33 French-Canadian women. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Jul;118(7):1220–7.e3.
10
Schoffman DE, Turner-McGrievy G, Jones SJ, and Wilcox S. Mobile apps for pediatric obesity prevention and treatment, healthy eating, and physical activity promotion: just fun and games? Behav Med Pract Policy Res. 2013 Sep;3(3):320–5.
11
Gnagnarella P, Misotti AM, Santoro L, Akoumianakis D, Del Campo L, De Lorenzo F, et al. Nutritional online information for cancer patients: a randomized trial of an internet communication plus social media intervention. J Cancer Educ. 2016 Sep;31(3):472–80.
12
Dumas A-A, Lapointe A, and Desroches S. Users, uses, and effects of social media in dietetic practice: scoping review of the quantitative and qualitative evidence. J Med Internet Res. 2018 Feb;20(2):e55.
13
Munk AK, Abildgaard MS, Birkbak A, Petersen MK. (Re-)Appropriating instagram for social research: three methods for studying obesogenic environments. In: Proceedings of the 7th 2016 International Conference on Social Media & Society. SM Society ’16; 2016 Jul 11–13; London, UK; 2016. p. 1–10.
14
Chen X and Yang X. Does food environment influence food choices? A geographical analysis through “tweets”. Appl Geogr. 2014;51:82–9.
15
Gomez-Lopez IN, Clarke P, Hill AB, Romero DM, Goodspeed R, Berrocal VJ, et al. Using social media to identify sources of healthy food in urban neighborhoods. J Urban Health. 2017 Jun;94(3):429–36.
16
Shen Y, Clarke P, Gomez-Lopez IN, Hill AB, Romero DM, Goodspeed R, et al. Using social media to assess the consumer nutrition environment: comparing Yelp reviews with a direct observation audit instrument for grocery stores. Public Health Nutr. 2019 Feb;22(2):257–64.
17
Effland T, Lawson A, Balter S, Devinney K, Reddy V, Waechter H, et al. Discovering foodborne illness in online restaurant reviews. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Dec;25(12):1586–92.
18
Oldroyd RA, Morris MA, and Birkin M. Identifying methods for monitoring foodborne illness: review of existing public health surveillance techniques. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2018;4(2):e57.
19
Clary C, Matthews SA, and Kestens Y. Between exposure, access and use: reconsidering foodscape influences on dietary behaviours. Health Place. 2017;44:1–7.
20
Mattioni D, Loconto AM, and Brunori G. Healthy diets and the retail food environment: a sociological approach. Health Place. 2020 Jan;61:102244.
21
Pitt E, Gallegos D, Comans T, Cameron C, and Thornton L. Exploring the influence of local food environments on food behaviours: a systematic review of qualitative literature. Public Health Nutr. 2017 Sep;20(13):2393–405.
22
Lynch M. Kindergarten food familiarization. An exploratory study of teachers’ perspectives on food and nutrition in kindergartens. Appetite. 2015;87:46–55.
23
Gregg R, Patel A, Patel S, and O’Connor L. Public reaction to the UK government strategy on childhood obesity in England: a qualitative and quantitative summary of online reaction to media reports. Health Policy. 2017 Apr;121(4):450–7.
24
Howarth A. Challenging the de-politicization of food poverty: austerity food blogs. In: Wealth creation and poverty reduction: breakthroughs in research and practice. Philadelphia, PA: IGI Global; 2020. p. 858–75.
25
Dumas A-A, Lemieux S, Lapointe A, Dugrenier M, and Desroches S. A comparative content analysis of vegetarian food blogs written by registered dietitians and non-registered dietitians. Can J Diet Pract Res. 2017 Mar;78(2):86–91.
26
Toth J, O’Connor C, Hartman B, Dworatzek P, and Horne J. “Detoxify or Die”: qualitative assessments of Ontario nutritionists’ and dietitians’ blog posts related to detoxification diets. Can J Diet Pract Res. 2019;80(3):116–21.
27
Kozinets R. Netnography: the essential guide to qualitative social media research. 3rd ed. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications; 2019.
28
Näkki P. Social media for citizen participation: report on the Somus project. Espoo, Finland: VTT; 2011.
29
Foster E, Lee C, Imamura F, Hollidge SE, Westgate KL, Venables MC, et al. Validity and reliability of an online self-report 24-h dietary recall method (Intake24): a doubly labelled water study and repeated-measures analysis. J Nutr Sci. 2019;8:e29.
30
Hookway NG, Snee H. The blogosphere. In: Fielding N, Lee RM, Blank G, editors. The SAGE handbook of online research methods. 2nd ed. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications; 2017. p. 380–98.
31
Sawhney M, Verona G, and Prandelli E. Collaborating to create: the internet as a platform for customer engagement in product innovation. Journal of Interactive Marketing. 2005 Jan;19(4):4–17.
32
Seeman N. Web 2.0 and chronic illness: new horizons, new opportunities; 2008 [cited 2020 Jul 18]. Available from: https://www.longwoods.com/content/19506//web-2.0-and-chronic-illness-new-horizons-new-opportunities.
33
Bullinger AC, Rass M, Adamczyk S, Moeslein KM, and Sohn S. Open innovation in health care: analysis of an open health platform. Health Policy. 2012 May;105(2–3):165–75.
34
Scanfeld D, Scanfeld V, and Larson EL. Dissemination of health information through social networks: twitter and antibiotics. Am J Infect Control. 2010 Apr;38(3):182–8.
35
Wallendorf M, Belk RW. Assessing trustworthiness in naturalistic consumer research. In: Hirschman EC, editor. SV—Interpretive consumer research. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research; 1989. p. 69–84.
36
Hargittai E and Shaw A. Mind the skills gap: the role of internet know-how and gender in differentiated contributions to Wikipedia. Inf Commun Soc. 2014 Apr;18(4):424–42.
37
Madrigal AC. Reddit demographics in one chart; 2013 [cited 2020 Jul 18]. Available from: https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2013/07/reddit-demographics-in-one-chart/277513/.
38
Markham A, Buchanan E. Ethical decision-making and internet research: recommendations from the AoIR ethics working committee [cited 2020 Jul 18]. Available from: aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf.
39
Ravn S, Barnwell A, and Neves BB. What is “publicly available data”? Exploring blurred public–private boundaries and ethical practices through a case study on Instagram. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2019 Feb;15(1–2):40–5.
40
Highfield T and Leaver T. Instagrammatics and digital methods: studying visual social media, from selfies and GIFs to memes and emoji. Commun Res Pract. 2016;2(1):47–62.
41
McDermott E, Roen K, and Piela A. Hard-to-reach youth online: methodological advances in self-harm research. Sex Res Social Policy. 2013;10(2):125–34.
42
Radzikowski J, Stefanidis A, Jacobsen KH, Croitoru A, Crooks A, and Delamater PL. The measles vaccination narrative in twitter: a quantitative analysis. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2016;2(1):e1.
43
Braun V, Clarke V, Hayfield N, Terry G. Thematic analysis. In: Liamputtong P, editor. Handbook of research methods in health social sciences. Singapore: Springer; 2019. p. 843–60.
44
Laestadius LI and Caldwell MA. Is the future of meat palatable? Perceptions of in vitro meat as evidenced by online news comments. Public Health Nutr. 2015;18(13):2457–67.
45
Giles EL and Adams JM. Capturing public opinion on public health topics: a comparison of experiences from a systematic review, focus group study, and analysis of online, user-generated content. Front Public Health. 2015;3:200.
46
Gregg R, Patel A, Patel S, and O’Connor L. Public reaction to the UK government strategy on childhood obesity in England: a qualitative and quantitative summary of online reaction to media reports. Health Policy. 2017;121(4):450–7.
47
Russell-Verma S, Smith H, and Jeffrey P. Public views on drought mitigation: evidence from the comments sections of on-line news sources. Urban Water J. 2015;13(5):454–62.
48
Lynch M, Brooks-Cleator LA, Giles AR, and Rumford MH. “RIP KFC”: public perceptions of a fast-food restaurant closure. Ecol Food Nutr. 2019;58(2):120–41.
49
Feinberg Y, Pereira JA, Quach S, Kwong JC, Crowcroft NS, Wilson SE, et al. Understanding public perceptions of the HPV vaccination based on online comments to Canadian news articles. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(6):e0129587.
50
Henrich N and Holmes B. What the public was saying about the H1N1 vaccine: perceptions and issues discussed in on-line comments during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(4):e18479.
51
Leggatt-Cook C and Chamberlain K. Blogging for weight loss: personal accountability, writing selves, and the weight-loss blogosphere. Sociol Health Illn. 2011;34(7):963–77.
52
Hart D. Faux-meat and masculinity: the gendering of food on three vegan blogs. Canadian Food Studies / La Revue Canadienne Des études Sur l’alimentation. 2018;5(1):133–55.
53
Salvio PM. Dishing it out: food blogs and post-feminist domesticity. Gastronomica. 2012;12(3):31–9.
54
Lynch M. Healthy habits or damaging diets: an exploratory study of a food blogging community. Ecol Food Nutr. 2010;49(4):316–35.
55
Lynch M. From food to fuel: perceptions of exercise and food in a community of food bloggers. Health Educ J. 2012;71(1):72–9.
56
Hawks SR, Madanat HN, and Christley HS. Behavioral and biological associations of dietary restraint: a review of the literature. Ecol Food Nutr. 2008;47(5):415–49.
57
Alexa. reddit.com competitive analysis, marketing mix and traffic [cited 2020 Jul 22]. Available from: https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/reddit.com.
58
Gruzd A, Lannigan J, and Quigley K. Examining government cross-platform engagement in social media: Instagram vs Twitter and the Big Lift project. Gov Inf Q. 2018;35(4):579–87.
59
Pappa GL, Cunha TO, Bicalho PV, Ribeiro A, Couto Silva AP, Meira W Jr, et al. Factors associated with weight change in online weight management communities: a case study in the LoseIt reddit community. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(1):e17.
60
Park A and Conway M. Longitudinal changes in psychological states in online health community members: understanding the long-term effects of participating in an online depression community. J Med Internet Res. 2017 Mar 20;19(3):e71.
61
Lynch M, Mah CL. Social-media discussion analysis as a tool for nutrition practitioners. UNSCN Nutr. 2020;(45):41–8.
62
Beagan BL, Chapman GE, and Power EM. Cultural and symbolic capital with and without economic constraint. Food Cult Soc. 2016;19(1):45–70.
63
Webber CB, Sobal J, and Dollahite JS. Shopping for fruits and vegetables. Food and retail qualities of importance to low-income households at the grocery store. Appetite. 2010;54(2):297–303.

Supplementary Material

File (cjdpr-2020-035suppla.pdf)

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

cover image Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research
Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research
Volume 82Number 2June 2021
Pages: 79 - 83
Editor: Naomi Cahill

History

Version of record online: 15 December 2020

Authors

Affiliations

Kennedy Laborde Ryan MA Student
Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
School of Journalism and Communication, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Other Metrics

Citations

Cite As

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

There are no citations for this item

View Options

Login options

Check if you access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Subscribe

Click on the button below to subscribe to Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research

Purchase options

Purchase this article to get full access to it.

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

View options

PDF

View PDF

Full Text

View Full Text

Media

Media

Other

Tables

Share Options

Share

Share the article link

Share on social media