Engagement, Innovation, and Impact in a Dietitian Contact Centre: The EatRight Ontario Experience
Publication: Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research
19 February 2020
Abstract
Purpose: EatRight Ontario (ERO), a multi-modal dietitian service (phone, email, web), provided the public and health intermediaries with healthy eating advice, professional support, and health promotion tools from 2007 to 2018. An evaluation of ERO was conducted to assess the impact of the model on knowledge, attitudes, and behaviour for consumers, utilization, and support levels and satisfaction provided to health intermediaries.
Methods: Consumer clients were sent a survey 1–4 weeks after using the ERO service to capture self-reported dietary changes, intentions, nutritional knowledge, and satisfaction. Health intermediaries were recruited through an electronic ERO newsletter and asked about how ERO supported their practice.
Results: Of the 867 consumer respondents, 92% had either made a change or indicated that information from ERO confirmed their present behaviour, and 96% indicated they would recommend the services to others. Of the 337 health intermediaries who responded 71% indicated that ERO provided services they could not deliver.
Conclusions: ERO’s multi-modal dietitian contact centre provides a model for implementing successful remote service access for consumers and professionals to support healthy eating across diverse demographics and geographies, including those in geographically underserved areas.
Résumé
Objectif. Saine alimentation Ontario (SAO), un service de diététistes multimodal (téléphone, courriel, Web), a fourni au public et aux intermédiaires de la santé des conseils sur la saine alimentation, du soutien professionnel et des outils de promotion de la santé de 2007 à 2018. Une évaluation de SAO a été menée pour évaluer l’impact du modèle sur les connaissances, les attitudes et les comportements des consommateurs, son utilisation, et les niveaux de soutien et la satisfaction des intermédiaires de la santé.
Méthodes. Les clients consommateurs ont reçu un sondage de 1 à 4 semaines après avoir utilisé le service de SAO afin de dresser un portrait des changements aux régimes alimentaires autodéclarés, des intentions, des connaissances sur la nutrition et de la satisfaction. Les intermédiaires de la santé ont été recrutés au moyen d’un bulletin électronique de SAO et questionnés au sujet de la manière dont SAO appuie leur pratique.
Résultats. Des 867 répondants consommateurs, 92 % ont soit apporté un changement ou indiqué que l’information de SAO a confirmé leur comportement présent, et 96 % ont indiqué qu’ils recommanderaient ce service à d’autres. Des 337 intermédiaires de la santé qui ont répondu au sondage, 71 % ont indiqué que SAO offre des services qu’ils ne peuvent pas fournir.
Conclusions. Le centre de contacts de diététistes multimodal de SAO est un modèle de mise en œuvre réussie d’accès à des services à distance pour les consommateurs et les professionnels, et ce modèle permet de favoriser une saine alimentation chez des personnes de différents profils démographiques et géographiques, y compris des régions mal desservies géographiquement.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Conflicts of interest: CN, BF, JK, AH, and JL were paid by Eat Right Ontario to conduct the evaluation. No restrictions were placed on the findings by ERO or the funder. HH, CM, and HB were all staff on the ERO initiative.
References
1
Kininmonth AR, Jamil N, Almatrouk N, and Evans CEL. Quality assessment of nutrition coverage in the media: a 6-week survey of five popular UK newspapers. BMJ Open. 2017;7(12):e014633.
2
Ostry A, Young ML, and Hughes M. The quality of nutritional information available on popular websites: a content analysis. Health Educ Res. 2008;23(4):648–55.
3
Carbone ET and Zoellner JM. Nutrition and health literacy: a systematic review to inform nutrition research and practice. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012 Feb;112(2):254–65.
4
Heldman AB, Schindelar J, and Weaver JB. Social media engagement and public health communication: implications for public health organizations being truly “social”. Public Health Rev. 2013;35(1):13.
5
Lippke S, Corbet JM, Lange D, Parschau L, and Schwarzer R. Intervention engagement moderates the dose–response relationships in a dietary intervention. Dose-Response. 2016;14(1):1–10.
6
Campbell NC, Murray E, Darbyshire J, Emery J, Farmer A, Griffiths F, et al. Designing and evaluating complex interventions to improve health care. BMJ. 2007 Mar;334(7591):455–9.
7
Länsisalmi H, Kivimäki M, Aalto P, and Ruoranen R. Innovation in healthcare: a systematic review of recent research. Nurs Sci Q. 2006 Jan;19(1):66–72.
8
Legare J, Charnaw-Burger J, Krajnak J, Forer B, Norman CD, Rootman I. EatRight Ontario dietitian advisory service pilot: final evaluation report. Toronto, ON: EatRight Ontario; 2007.
9
Legare J, Charnaw-Burger J, Forer B, Norman CD. EatRight Ontario program review. Toronto, ON: EatRight Ontario; 2012.
10
Howard Research Inc. Health lines multi jurisdictional collaboration. Literature review: evaluative aspects of health line initiatives. Edmonton, AB: Howard Research Inc.; 2005.
11
Jacobs W, Amuta AO, and Jeon KC. Health information seeking in the digital age: an analysis of health information seeking behavior among US adults. Cogent Soc Sci. 2017;3(1):13202785.
12
Celis-Morales C, Lara J, and Mathers JC. Personalising nutritional guidance for more effective behaviour change. Proc Nutr Soc. 2015;74:130–8.
13
Teixeira PJ, Carraça E V, Marques MM, Rutter H, Oppert JM, De Bourdeaudhuij I, et al. Successful behavior change in obesity interventions in adults: a systematic review of self-regulation mediators. BMC Med. 2015;13:84.
14
Reinsel D, Gantz J, Rydning J. Data age 2025: the evolution of data to life-critical: don’t focus on big data; focus on the data that’s big. Framingham, MA: Seagate; 2017.
15
Norman CD, Haresign H, Mehling C, and Bloomberg H. Exploring the feasibility and potential of virtual panels for soliciting feedback on nutrition education materials: a proof-of-concept study. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2016;2(1):e18.
16
Lieffers JRL, Haresign H, Mehling C, Arocha JF, and Hanning RM. A qualitative evaluation of contact centre dietitian support and electronic motivational messaging for eaTracker my goals users. Can J Diet Pract Res. 2018 Jun;79(2):67–73.
17
Hanna L, Huggins CE, Furness K, Silvers MA, Savva J, Frawley H, et al. Effect of early and intensive nutrition care, delivered via telephone or mobile application, on quality of life in people with upper gastrointestinal cancer: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2018 Dec;18(1):707.
18
Chen J, Lieffers J, Bauman A, Hanning R, and Allman-Farinelli M. Designing health apps to support dietetic professional practice and their patients: qualitative results from an international survey. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Mar;5(3):e40.
19
Flodgren G, Rachas A, Farmer AJ, Inzitari M, Shepperd S. Interactive telemedicine: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep;(9):CD002098.
20
Jahangiry L, Montazeri A, Najafi M, Yaseri M, and Farhangi MA. An interactive web-based intervention on nutritional status, physical activity and health-related quality of life in patient with metabolic syndrome: a randomized-controlled trial (The Red Ruby Study). Nutr Diabetes. 2017 Jan;7(1):e240.
21
Mehling C, Morris T, Barbieri R, and Edwards S. Motivation over the phone (MOPing): an innovative approach by EatRight Ontario to promote healthy eating behaviour change. Can J Diet Pract Res. 2017;78(3):156–7.
Supplementary Material
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research
Volume 81 • Number 3 • September 2020
Pages: 106 - 111
History
Version of record online: 19 February 2020
Copyright
© 2020.
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Other Metrics
Citations
Cite As
Cameron D.NormanPhD, MDes, CE, HelenHaresignMSc, FDC, RD, BarryForerPhD, ChristineMehlingMSc, RD, JudithKrajnakPhD, HoneyBloombergMHSc, RD, AdamHoweMA, and JeanneLegareDN, MPA. 2020. Engagement, Innovation, and Impact in a Dietitian Contact Centre: The EatRight Ontario Experience. Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research.
81(3): 106-111. https://doi.org/10.3148/cjdpr-2020-002
Export Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
There are no citations for this item
View Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Subscribe
Click on the button below to subscribe to Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research
