Unintended Consequences of “Breast Is Best” Messaging on Mothers: An Autoethnography
Publication: Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research
7 March 2023
Abstract
Purpose: To describe the breastfeeding experiences of a dietitian and mother so as to expose dominant discourses reinforcing expert-driven imperatives to breastfeed.
Methods: Professional experiences and personal challenges related to breastfeeding promotion are described, analyzed, and interpreted using autoethnography. The social ecological model (SEM) is used as a sensitizing concept to guide the organization, presentation, and analysis of experiences.
Results: Data were organized into two discussion themes: breastfeeding promotion practices and “failure” to breastfeed. Dominant discourses reinforcing expert-driven imperatives to breastfeed are revealed, including health as a duty, intensive motherhood, and mother blame. Discourses promoting or reinforcing breastfeeding simultaneously judge and denormalize formula-feeding.
Conclusions: Contemporary breastfeeding promotion messages and strategies are quiet coercions used to influence infant-feeding decisions and do not support the principles of evidence-based practice, person-centred care, and informed choice.
Résumé
Objectif. Décrire l’expérience d’allaitement d’une mère diététiste afin de mettre au jour les discours dominants qui renforcent la pression d’allaiter qu’exercent les experts sur les mères.
Méthodes. Les expériences professionnelles et les défis personnels liés à la promotion de l’allaitement sont décrits, analysés et interprétés à l’aide de l’autoethnographie. Le modèle socio-écologique est utilisé comme concept de sensibilisation afin de guider l’organisation, la présentation et l’analyse des expériences.
Résultats. Les données ont été organisées en deux sujets de discussion : les pratiques de promotion de l’allaitement et le « refus » d’allaiter. Les discours dominants qui renforcent la pression d’allaiter qu’exercent les experts sur les mères sont révélés, notamment la santé comme un devoir, la maternité intensive et le blâme de la mère. Les discours promouvant ou renforçant l’allaitement maternel jugent simultanément l’allaitement artificiel et le dénormalisent.
Conclusions. Les stratégies et messages contemporains de promotion de l’allaitement sont des coercitions silencieuses utilisées pour influencer les décisions en matière d’alimentation des nourrissons et n’appuient pas les principes de la pratique reposant sur des données probantes, des soins centrés sur la personne et du choix éclairé.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
REFERENCES
1
The 19th News, Health: When ‘breast is best’ becomes too much; August 2021 [cited 2022 March 5]. Available from: https://19thnews.org/2021/08/when-breast-is-best-becomes-too-much/
2
Nathoo T, Ostry A. The one best way? Breastfeeding history, politics and policy in Canada. Waterloo, ON: Wilfrid Laurier University Press; 2009.
3
World Health Organization. Breastfeeding; [cited 2022 March 5]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/infant-and-young-child-feeding
4
Health Canada. Infant feeding; 2015 [cited 2019 Jan 26]. Available from: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fn-an/nutrition/infant-nourisson/index-eng.php
5
Canadian Paediatric Society. The Baby-Friendly Initiative; 2020 [cited 2022 March 5]. Available from: https://cps.ca/documents/position/baby-friendly-initiative-breastfeeding
6
Dietitians of Canada. Breastfeeding benefits for baby; 2018 [cited 2022 Jun 14]. Available from: https://www.unlockfood.ca/en/Articles/Breastfeeding-Infant-feeding/Breastfeeding-is-best-for-baby.aspx
7
Health Canada. Nutrition for healthy term infants: Recommendations from birth to six months; 2015 [cited 2019 Jan 26]. Available from: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fn-an/nutrition/infant-nourisson/recom/index-eng.php
8
Nova Scotia Health Promotion. Nova Scotia health promotion and protection policy statement; 2006 [cited 2019 Jan 26]. Available from: https://first6weeks.novascotia.ca/documents/Provincial_Breastfeeding_Policy.pdf
9
Rollins N, Bhandari N, Hajeebhoy N, Horton S, Lutter CK, Martines JC, et al. Why invest, and what it will take to improve breastfeeding practices? Lancet. 2016;387(10017):491–504.
10
Thinkwell Research. Breastfeeding campaign: Focus group research. 2007, Jul.
11
Shakespeare J, Blake F, and Garcia J. Breast-feeding difficulties experienced by women taking part in a qualitative interview study of postnatal depression. Midwifery. 2004; 20:251–260.
12
Sheehan A, Schmied V, and Barclay L. Women’s experiences of infant feeding support in the first 6 weeks post-birth. Matern Child Nutr. 2009; 5:138–150.
13
Dennis C. Mothering Transitions Research; c2010 [cited 2017 Apr 2]. Available from: http://www.cindyleedennis.ca/research/1-breastfeeding/breastfeeding-self-efficacy/
14
Marshall JL, Godfrey M, and Renfrew MJ. Being a good mother: managing breastfeeding and merging identities. Soc Sci Med. 2007; 65:21 47–59.
15
Radzyminski S and Clark Callister L. Mother’s beliefs, attitudes, and decision making related to infant feeding choices. Perinat Educ. 2016; 25(1): 18–28.
16
Frank L. Exploring infant feeding practices in food insecure households: what is the real issue? Food and Foodways. 2015;23(3):186–209.
17
Orr SK, Dachner N, Frank L, and Tarasuk V. Relation between household food insecurity and breastfeeding in Canada. CMAJ. 2018;190(11): E312–E319.
18
Hemeon, J. The social construction of stigma associated with the normalization of Breastfeeding: An Autoethnography; 2018 [cited 2022 March 5]. Available from: http://ec.msvu.ca:8080/xmlui/handle/10587/1908
19
Partnership for Dietetic Education and Practice Integrated Competencies for Dietetic Education and Practice (ICDEP) Version 3.0 2020; July 15, 2020 (Revised August 4) [cited 2021 May 15]. Available from: https://www.pdep.ca/library/PDEP-Policies/Integrated-Competencies-For-Dietetic-Education-And.aspx
20
The American Geriatrics Society Expert Panel on Person Centered Care. Person-centered care: a definition and essential elements. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016;64(1):15–18. Available from:
21
Holstein JA, Gubrium JF. Handbook of constructionist research. New York, NY: The Guilford Press; 2008.
22
Sparkes A. Autoethnography and narratives of self: Reflections on criteria in action. Sociol Sport J. 2000; 17: 21–43.
23
Stahlke Wall S. Toward a moderate autoethnography. Int J Qual Methods. 2016 Jan-Dec;1-9.
24
Wall S. An autoethnography on learning about autoethnography, Int J Qual Methods. 2006;5(2): Article 9. Available from:
25
Chang H. Autoethnography as method. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press; 2008.
26
Taber N. Institutional ethnography, autoethnography, and narrative: An argument for incorporating multiple methodologies. Qual Res. 2010;10(5):5–25. Available from:
27
McIlveen P. Autoethnography as a method for reflexive research and practice in vocational psychology. AJCD. 2008;17(2):13–18.
28
Rodgers BE. An ecological approach to understanding stigma associated with receiving mental health services: The role of social proximity; 2009 [cited 2019 Jan 26]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10919/29982
29
McLeroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A, and Glanz K. An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Q. 1988;15(4):351–377.
30
Golden SD and Earp JL. Social ecological approaches to individuals and their contexts: Twenty years of health education and behaviour health promotion interventions. Health Educ Behav. 2012;39(3):364–372.
31
Rosa EM and Tudge J. Urie Bronfenbrenner’s theory of human development: Its evolution from ecology to bioecology. JFTR. 2013;5(4), 243–258.
32
Gregson J, Foerster SB, Orr R, Jones L, Benedict J, Clarke B, et al. System, environmental, and policy changes: using the social-ecological model as a framework for evaluating nutrition education and social marketing programs with low-income audiences. J Nutr Educ. 2001; 33(1):S4–S14.
33
Bochner AP. Narrative’s virtues. Qual Inq. 2000;7:131–157.
34
LeRoux C. An autoethnographic appraisal of autoethnography as a research method. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 2016;20(2):1–13.
35
Murphy E. Quiet coercions: Medicine, morality and motherhood [inaugural lecture]; 2010 October; University of Leicester.
36
Thomson G, Ebisch-Burton K, and Flacking R. Shame if you do–shame if you don’t: women’s experiences of infant feeding Maternal Child Nutr. 2015; 11:33–46.
37
Crossley M. Breastfeeding as a moral imperative: an autoethnographic study. Fem Psychol. 2009;19(1): 71–87.
38
Law J. The politics of breastfeeding: Assessing risk, dividing labor. Signs. 2000; 25(2): 407–450.
39
Williams K, Kurz T, Summers M, and Crabb S. Discursive constructions of infant feeding: The dilemma of mothers’ ‘guilt.’ Fem Psychol. 2012;23(3):339–358.
40
Murphy E. Expertise and forms of knowledge in the government of families. Sociol Rev. 2003;51(4):433–462.
41
Region of Peel. Learning to breastfeed; [cited 2020 June 3]. Available from: https://www.peelregion.ca/parenting/feeding-baby/breastfeeding.asp
42
University of Edinburgh Scottish Sensory Centre. Informed choice from theory into practice; 2010 [cited 2019 Jan 26]. Available from: http://www.ssc.education.ed.ac.uk/courses/deaf/dmar10.html
43
Leichter HM. Lifestyle correctness and the new secular morality. In Brandt AM, Rozin P, editors. Morality and health. Routledge; 1997.
44
Murphy, E. Risk, maternal ideologies, and infant feeding: A sociology of food and nutrition. New York: Oxford University Press; 2004.
45
Mykhalovskiy E and McCoy L. Troubling ruling discourses of health: Using institutional ethnography in community-based research. Crit Public Health. 2002;12(1):17–37.
46
Murphy E. Risk responsibility, and rhetoric in infant feeding. J Contemp Ethnogr. 2000;29(3):291–325.
47
Murphy E. ‘Breast is best’: Infant feeding decisions and maternal deviance. Sociol Health Illn. 1999; 21:187–208.
48
MacLean L, Edwards N, Garrard M, Sims-Jones N, Clinton K, and Obesity Ashley L., Stigma and public health planning. Health Promot Int. 2009Mar;24(1):88–93.
49
Stuber J, Meyer I, and Link B. Stigma prejudice, discrimination and health. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67(3):351.
50
Moss-Racusin C, Schofield C, Brown S, and O’Brien K. Breast is (viewed as) best: Demonstrating formula feeding stigma. Psychol Women Quart. 2020;44(4):503–520.
51
Singh I. Doing their jobs: Mothering with ritalin in a culture of mother-blame. Soc Sci Med. 2004; 59:1193–1205.
52
Lee E. Health morality, and infant feeding: British mothers’ experiences of formula milk use in the early weeks. Sociol Health Illn. 2007;29(7):1075–1090.
53
Ladores S and Aroian K. First-time mothers with a history of infertility: Their internalized pressure to breastfeed. J Hum Lact. 2015;1–7.
54
Braimoh J and Davies L. When ‘breast’ is no longer ‘best’: Post-partum constructions of infant-feeding in the hospital. Soc Sci Med. 2014; 123:82–89.
55
Larsen JS and Kronborg H. When breastfeeding is unsuccessful – mothers’ experiences after giving up breastfeeding. Scand J Caring Sci. 2012;848–56.
56
Corrigan PW and Rao D. On the self-stigma of mental illness: Stages, disclosure, and strategies for change. Can J Psychiatry. 2012;57(8):464–469.
57
Jackson D and Mannix J. Giving voice to the burden of blame: A feminist study of mothers’ experiences of mother blaming. Int J Nurs Pract. 2004; 10:150–158.
58
Lordly D. Once upon a time…. Storytelling to enhance teaching and learning. Can J Diet Prac Res. 2007; 68:30–35.
59
Holt NL. Representation legitimation, and autoethnography: An autoethnographic writing story. Int J Qual Methods. 2003;2(1):18–28.
60
Ellis C, Sociological introspection and emotional experience. Symb Interact. 1991;14(1):23–50.
61
Munro S, Buckett C, Sou J, Bansback N, and Lau H. Shared decision making and breastfeeding: Supporting families’ informed choices. BCMJ 2019; 61(10)394.
62
Kukla R. Ethics and ideology in breastfeeding advocacy campaigns. Hypatia. 2006 [cited 2018 Feb 13];21(1): 157–180.
63
MacLean L, Edwards N, Garrard M, Sims-Jones N, Clinton K, and Ashley L. Obesity stigma and public health planning. Health Promot Int. 2009 Jan [cited 2018 Feb 13];24(1):88–93.
64
Goncalves A. What influences women to bottle-feed from birth and to discontinue breastfeeding early? BMJ 2017; 25(7):442–450.
Supplementary Material
File (cjdpr-2022-038suppla.docx)
- Download
- 26.41 KB
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research
Volume 84 • Number 3 • September 2023
Pages: 124 - 133
Editor: Naomi Cahill
History
Version of record online: 7 March 2023
Copyright
© 2023.
Key Words
Mots-clés
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Other Metrics
Citations
Cite As
JenniferHemeonRD, MScAHN, DeborahNorrisPhD, SarahStahlkePhD, and DaphneLordlyRD, DEd. 2023. Unintended Consequences of “Breast Is Best” Messaging on Mothers: An Autoethnography. Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research.
84(3): 124-133. https://doi.org/10.3148/cjdpr-2022-038
Export Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
There are no citations for this item
View Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Subscribe
Click on the button below to subscribe to Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research
