How Can Dietitians Leverage Change for Sustainable Food Systems in Canada?

Publication: Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research
25 March 2019

Abstract

Purpose: In this paper, we begin to set out language defining sustainable food systems (SFS) in Canada, through the voices of dietitians, and identify leverage points where dietitians can affect change.
Methods: Dietitians of Canada members were invited to a Delphi Inquiry process; questions explored a vision of SFS in Canada, barriers to that vision, and actions. Results were independently analysed by 2 members of the research team who used the Framework for Strategic Sustainable Development to structure the data.
Results: Fifty-eight members participated. The resultant vision describes a future food system in 15 thematic areas of the social and ecological systems. Barriers are described according to how they undermine sustainability. High-leverage actions areas included: (i) facilitating knowledge development within the profession and public, (ii) influencing organizational policy to support SFS, and (iii) and influencing public policy. Approaches to such action included: (i) facilitating cross-sectoral collaboration and (ii) applying reflexive approaches.
Conclusions: This research suggests a multidimensional understanding of food systems sustainability among dietitians. The vision provides some language to describe what dietitians mean by SFS and can be used as a compass point to orient action. Action areas and approaches have the potential to drive systemic change while avoiding unintended consequences.

Résumé

Objectif. Dans cet article, nous commençons à établir la terminologie qui définit les systèmes alimentaires durables (SAD) au Canada, par la voix des diététistes, et à cerner les points de levier où les diététistes peuvent contribuer au changement.
Méthodes. Les membres des Diététistes du Canada ont été invités à prendre part à un processus de recherche faisant appel à la méthode Delphi; les questions portaient sur une vision des SAD au Canada, les obstacles à cette vision et les mesures à prendre. Les résultats ont été analysés de manière indépendante par deux membres de l’équipe de recherche qui ont utilisé le cadre de développement durable stratégique pour structurer les données.
Résultats. Cinquante-huit membres ont participé au processus. La vision qui en découle décrit un système alimentaire futur dans 15 domaines thématiques des systèmes sociaux et écologiques. Les obstacles sont décrits conformément à la manière dont ils nuisent à la durabilité du point de vue de l’environnement. Les domaines d’action à effet de levier important sont les suivants : (i) favoriser l’acquisition de connaissances au sein de la profession et du public, (ii) influencer les politiques organisationnelles pour appuyer les SAD et (iii) influencer les politiques publiques. Les approches associées à de telles actions sont les suivantes : (i) favoriser la collaboration intersectorielle et (ii) adopter des approches réflexives.
Conclusions. Cette recherche suggère qu’il existe une compréhension multidimensionnelle de la durabilité des systèmes alimentaires chez les diététistes. La vision fournit une certaine terminologie pour décrire ce que les diététistes entendent par SAD et elle peut être utilisée comme point de repère pour orienter les actions. Les domaines d’action et les approches ont le potentiel d’entraîner des changements systémiques tout en évitant les conséquences non désirées.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Sources of financial support: The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from VINNOVA (Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation Systems) and the Acadia University Research Fund.
Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1
IPES-Food. Unravelling the food-health nexus: addressing practices, political economy, and power relations to build healthier food systems; 2017 [cited 2017 Nov 11]. Available from: http://www.ipes-food.org/health.
2
Rittel HWJ and Webber MM. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci. 1973 Jun 1;4(2):155–69.
3
Dyball R. Human ecology and open transdisciplinary inquiry. In: Harris J, Brown VA, Russell J, editors. Tackling wicked problems: through the transdisciplinary imagination. London, UK: Earthscan from Routledge; 2010. p. 273–84.
4
Mason P, Lang T. Sustainable diets: how ecological nutrition can transform consumption and the food system. London, UK: Earthscan from Routledge; 2017.
5
Dyball R and Carlsson L. Ellen Swallow Richards: mother of human ecology? Human Ecology Review. 2017;23(2):17–28.
6
Nordisk Ministerråd. Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2012. Part 4: food, food patterns and health: guidelines for a healthy diet, breastfeeding, sustainable food consumption and dietary antioxidants; 2014 [cited 2018 Nov 28]. Available from: http://norden.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A745807&dswid=6553.
7
Harmon AHGerald BL. American Dietetic Association. Position of the American Dietetic Association: food and nutrition professionals can implement practices to conserve natural resources and support ecological sustainability. J Am Diet Assoc. 2007;107:1033–43.
8
Nordin S. Sustainable nutrition manual: never ending food; 2018 [cited 2018 Feb 11]. Available from: http://www.neverendingfood.org/sustainable-nutrition-manual/.
9
British Dietetic Association. British Dietetic Association policy statement: sustainable diets; 2017 [cited 2018 Feb 11]. Available from: https://www.bda.uk.com/improvinghealth/healthprofessionals/policy_statement-_sustainable_food.
10
Gussow JD. Dietary guidelines for sustainability. J Nutr Educ. 1986;18(1):1–5.
11
Sharp M. CEO ENDS interpretation [2016–2020]. Toronto, ON: Dietitians of Canada; 2016.
12
Johnston JL, Fanzo JC, and Cogill B. Understanding sustainable diets: a descriptive analysis of the determinants and processes that influence diets and their impact on health, food security, and environmental sustainability. Adv Nutr. 2014;5:418–29.
13
Fanzo J, Cogill B, Mattei F. Metrics of sustainable diets and food systems. Rome, Italy: Bioversity International; 2012.
14
Gustafson D, Gutman A, Leet W, Drewnowski A, Fanzo J, and Ingram J. Seven food system metrics of sustainable nutrition security. Sustainability. 2016 Feb 23;8(3):196.
15
Burlingame B, Dernini S. Sustainable diets and biodiversity: directions and solutions for policy, research and action. Rome, Italy: Nutrition and Consumer Protection Division, Food and Agriculture Organization; 2012.
16
Allen T, Cogill B. Metrics of sustainable diets and food systems: workshop report. Montpellier, France: Bioversity International & CIHEAM-IAMM; 2014.
17
Allen T and Prosperi P. Modeling sustainable food systems. Environ Manage. 2016 May 1;57(5):956–75.
18
Broman GI and Robèrt K-H. A framework for strategic sustainable development. J Clean Prod. 2017;140(1):17–31.
19
Carlsson L, Callaghan E, Morley A, and Broman G. Food system sustainability across scales: a proposed local-to-global approach to community planning and assessment. Sustainability. 2017 Jun 19;9(6):1061.
20
Kezar A and Maxey D. The Delphi technique: an untapped approach of participatory research. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2016;19(2):143–60.
21
Hasson F and Keeney S. Enhancing rigour in the Delphi technique research. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2011;78(9):1695–704.
22
Dietitians of Canada. Sustainable food initiative; 2017 [cited 2018 Feb 15]. Available from: https://www.dietitians.ca/Member/Get-Involved/Sustainable-Food-Systems-(SFS)-that-Promote-Health.aspx.
23
Carlsson L and Williams PL. New approaches to the health promoting school: participation in sustainable food systems. J Hunger Environ Nutr. 2008 Dec 11;3(4):400–17.
24
Carlsson L, Williams PL, Hayes-Conroy JS, Lordly D, and Callaghan E. School gardens: cultivating food security in Nova Scotia public schools? Can J Diet Pract Res. 2016 Sep;77:119–24.
25
Abson DJ, Fischer J, Leventon J, Newig J, Schomerus T, Vilsmaier U, et al. Leverage points for sustainability transformation. Ambio. 2017 Feb;46(1):30–9.
26
Meadows D. Leverage points: places to intervene in a system. The Sustainability Institute, Burlington, VT; 1999.
27
High Level Panel of Experts (HLPE). Food losses and waste in the context of sustainable food systems. A report by the high level panel of experts on food security and nutrition on world food security. Report No. 8. United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy; 2014 [cited 2018 Feb 11]. Available from: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i3901e.pdf.
28
Wynes S and Nicholas KA. The climate mitigation gap: education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions. Environ Res Lett. 2017;12(7):074024.
29
Sumner J. Food literacy and adult education: learning to read the world by eating. Canadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education. 2013;25(2):79–92.
30
Food Climate Research Network. Chapter 10: what can be done to shift eating patterns in healthier, more sustainable directions? 2015 [cited 2018 Jun 7]. Available from: https://foodsource.org.uk/sites/default/files/chapters/pdfs/foodsource_chapter_10.pdf.
31
Garnett T, Mathewson S, Angelides P, Borthwick F. Policies and actions to shift eating patterns: what works? 2015 [cited 2015 Jul 15]. Available from: http://www.fcrn.org.uk/sites/default/files/fcrn_chatham_house_0.pdf.
32
Wegener J. Equipping future generations of registered dietitian nutritionists and public health nutritionists: a commentary on education and training needs to promote sustainable food systems and practices in the 21st century. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Jan 6;118(3):393–8.
33
Wegener J and Petitclerc M. Opportunities and challenges for practical training in public health: insights from practicum coordinators in Ontario. Can J Diet Prac Res. 2018 Nov 1;79:176–80.
34
Powroznik KM. Healthism and weight-based discrimination: the unintended consequences of health promotion in the workplace. Work Occup. 2017 May 1;44(2):139–70.
35
Garnett T. Plating up solutions. Science. 2016 Sep 16;353(6305):1202–4.
36
Garnett T. Three perspectives on sustainable food security: efficiency, demand restraint, food system transformation. What role for life cycle assessment? J Clean Prod. 2014;73:10–8.
37
Marsden T, Morley A. Current food questions and their scholarly challenges: creating and framing a sustainable food paradigm. In: Marsden T, Morley A, editors. Sustainable food systems: building a new paradigm. London, UK: Routledge; 2014. p. 1–29.
38
Hodgekinson GP and Healy M. Psychological foundations of dynamic capabilities: reflexion and reflection in strategic management. Strategic Management Journal. 2011;32:1500–16.
39
Morgan K, Morley A. The public plate: harnessing the power of purchase. In: Marsden T, Morley A, editors. Sustainable food systems: building a new paradigm. London, UK: Routledge; 2014. p. 84–102.
40
Dietitians of Canada. Community food security position of dietitians of Canada. Toronto, ON: Dietitians of Canada; 2011.
41
Wilson ED and Garcia AC. ‘Going green’ in food services: can health care adopt environmentally friendly practices? Can J Diet Prac Res. 2011 Feb 14;72(1):43–7.
42
Fischer CG, Garnett T. Plates, pyramids, planet; 2016 [cited 2018 Apr 12]. Available from: http://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/d8dfeaf1-f859-4191-954f-e8e1388cd0b7.
43
Sustainable Food Systems Leadership Team of Dietitians of Canada. The environment and a sustainable food supply. Section of “dietary guidance and food guide consultation” Dietitians of Canada response to Health Canada. Toronto, ON: Dietitians of Canada; 2016.
44
Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. What we have learned: principles of truth and reconciliation; 2015 [cited 2018 Feb 21]. Available from: http://publications.gc.ca/site/eng/9.800280/publication.html.
45
Power EM. Conceptualizing food security for Aboriginal people in Canada. Can J Public Health. 2008;99(2):95–7.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

cover image Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research
Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research
Volume 80Number 4December 2019
Pages: 164 - 171

History

Version of record online: 25 March 2019

Authors

Affiliations

Liesel Carlsson MSc
School of Nutrition and Dietetics, Acadia University, Wolfville, NS
Department of Strategic Sustainable Development, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlskrona, Sweden
Edith Callaghan PhD
Department of Strategic Sustainable Development, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlskrona, Sweden
Fred. C. Manning School of Business, Acadia University, Wolfville, NS
Göran Broman PhD
Department of Strategic Sustainable Development, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlskrona, Sweden

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Other Metrics

Citations

Cite As

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

There are no citations for this item

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Subscribe

Click on the button below to subscribe to Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research

Purchase options

Purchase this article to get full access to it.

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

View options

PDF

View PDF

Full Text

View Full Text

Media

Media

Other

Tables

Share Options

Share

Share the article link

Share on social media